• Corpus ID: 7671737

What Makes a Classical Concept Classical ? Toward a Reconstruction of Niels Bohr ' s Philosophy of Physics

@inproceedings{Howard1986WhatMA,
  title={What Makes a Classical Concept Classical ? Toward a Reconstruction of Niels Bohr ' s Philosophy of Physics},
  author={Don A. Howard},
  year={1986}
}
“Every description of natural processes must be based on ideas which have been introduced and defined by the classical theory.” — Niels Bohr, 1923 “There must be quite definite and clear grounds, why you repeatedly declare that one must interpret observations classically, which lie absolutely in their essence. . . . It must belong to your deepest conviction—and I cannot understand on what you base it.” — Erwin Schrödinger to Niels Bohr, 13 October 1935 

Figures from this paper

Niels Bohr’s Generalization of Classical Mechanics

We clarify Bohr’s interpretation of quantum mechanics by demonstrating the central role played by his thesis that quantum theory is a rational generalization of classical mechanics. This thesis is

Who Invented the “Copenhagen Interpretation”? A Study in Mythology

What is commonly known as the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, regarded as representing a unitary Copenhagen point of view, differs significantly from Bohr’s complementarity

Bohr’s Relational Holism and the Classical-Quantum Interaction

In this paper I present and critically discuss the main strategies that Bohr used and could have used to fend off the charge that his interpretation does not provide a clear-cut distinction between

Complementarity and Scientific Rationality

Bohr’s interpretation of quantum mechanics has been criticized as incoherent and opportunistic, and based on doubtful philosophical premises. If so Bohr’s influence, in the pre-war period of

Reexamining the Quantum-Classical Relation: Beyond Reductionism and Pluralism

Classical mechanics and quantum mechanics are two of the most successful scientific theories ever discovered, and yet how they can describe the same world is far from clear: one theory is

Niels Bohr and the Formalism of Quantum Mechanics

It has often been remarked that Bohr's writings on the interpretation of quantum mechanics make scant reference to the mathematical formalism of quantum theory; and it has not infrequently been

ec 2 00 4 Complementarity and Scientific Rationality

Bohr’s interpretation of quantum mechanics has been criticized as incoherent and opportunistic, and based on doubtful philosophical premises. If so Bohr’s influence, in the pre-war period of

Bohr meets Rovelli: a dispositionalist account of the quantum limits of knowledge

  • Mauro Dorato
  • Philosophy
    Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations
  • 2020
I begin by examining the question of the quantum limits of knowledge by briefly presenting the constraints of the theory that derive from its mathematical structure (in particular the no-go theorems
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 32 REFERENCES

The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics

Niels Bohr, the founding father of modern atomic physics and quantum theory, was as original a philosopher as he was a physicist. This study explores several dimensions of Bohr's vision: the

Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics

Preface Acknowledgements 1. Wave-particle duality 2. Niels Bohr and wave-particle duality 3. From duality to complementarity 4. The meaning of complementarity 5. The foundations of kinematic-dynamic

The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory

It is an unusual pleasure to present Professor Heisenberg’s Chicago lectures on “The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory” to a wider audience than could attend them when they were originally

The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory

IN connexion with the discussion of the physical interpretation of the quantum theoretical methods developed during recent years, I should like to make the following general remarks regarding the

The Quantum Theory

IN a lecture on the quantum theory it might be thought fitting to commence with a clear explanation of the purpose, nature, and scope of the subject; but an attempt to answer briefly the question,

The Philosophy of Niels Bohr: The Framework of Complementarity

Introduction. 1 . What is complementarity? 2 . Bohr's philosophical orientation. 3 . Quantum theory and the description of nature. 4 . The birth of complementarity. 5 . The refinement of

On the notions of causality and complementarity.

This article presents the logical structure of Bohr's paper and tries to form a specific view on what role common language plays in physics by giving a short summary of the paper.

Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?

Consideration of the problem of making predictions concerning a system on the basis of measurements made on another system that had previously interacted with it leads to the result that one is led to conclude that the description of reality as given by a wave function is not complete.

Quantum physics and ordinary language

The part of ordinary language dealing with external phenomena is the primary means of description in scientific investigations where the principal objects are so large that they can easily be

QUANTEN‐MECHANIK UND WIRKLICHKEIT

Zusammenfassung Fasst man die Ψ-Funktion in der Quantenmechanik als eine (im Prinzip) vollstandige Beschreibung eines realen Sachverhaltes auf, so ist die Hypothese einer schwer annehm-baren