What Is the Empirical Basis for Paying for Quality in Health Care?

@article{Rosenthal2006WhatIT,
  title={What Is the Empirical Basis for Paying for Quality in Health Care?},
  author={Meredith B Rosenthal and Richard G. Frank},
  journal={Medical Care Research and Review},
  year={2006},
  volume={63},
  pages={135 - 157}
}
  • M. Rosenthal, R. Frank
  • Published 1 April 2006
  • Medicine, Political Science
  • Medical Care Research and Review
Despite more than a decade of benchmarking and public reporting of quality problems in the health care sector, changes in medical practice have been slow to materialize. To accelerate quality improvement, many private and public payers have begun to offer financial incentives to physicians and hospitals based on their performance on clinical and service quality measures. The authors review the empirical literature on paying for quality in health care and comparable interventions in other… 
Pay-for-Performance and Accountability: Related Themes in Improving Health Care
  • J. Rowe
  • Medicine, Political Science
    Annals of Internal Medicine
  • 2006
TLDR
Fueled by the emergence of increasingly good evidence and relentless pressure from government and private payers to provide value, the time may come when a substantial portion of physician compensation in the United States will be pay-for-performance.
Financial Incentives to Encourage Value-Based Health Care
TLDR
Allowing payments to be used for specific purposes, such as quality improvement, had a higher likelihood of a positive effect, compared with using funding for physician income, and the size of incentive payments relative to revenue was not associated with the proportion of positive outcomes.
Can You Get What You Pay For? Pay-for-Performance and the Quality of Healthcare Providers
TLDR
This work uses data from published performance reports of physician medical groups contracting with a large network HMO to compare clinical quality before and after the implementation of P4P, relative to a control group, and fails to find evidence that a large P 4P initiative either resulted in major improvement in quality or notable disruption in care.
Pay for Performance in Primary Care: The Use of Administrative Data by Health Economists
The purpose of this chapter is to report how researchers in health economics and management have benefited from the linkage of several administrative datasets to measure the performance and analyse
The effect of pay-for-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement.
TLDR
It is suggested that tailoring pay-for-performance programs to hospitals' specific situations could have the greatest effect on health care quality.
Pay for performance in primary care: proceed with caution, pitfalls ahead.
  • B. Hutchison
  • Medicine, Political Science
    Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante
  • 2008
TLDR
The QOF is a voluntary program that provides financial incentives for general practices to meet performance criteria in four domains: clinical, organizational, patient experience and additional services, which were chosen and weighted based on the prevalence and illness burden of the target conditions.
Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice.
TLDR
Paying clinicians to reach a common, fixed performance target may produce little gain in quality for the money spent and will largely reward those with higher performance at baseline.
Effect of Financial Incentives on Improvement in Medical Quality Indicators for Primary Care
TLDR
Evaluating the effect of a physician pay-for-performance program similar to the Medicare Physician Quality Reporting Initiative program on quality of preventive care in a network of community health centers found no evidence for a clinically significant effect of financial incentives on performance of preventive health care.
Economic Incentives in General Practice: the Impact of Pay for Participation Programs on Diabetes Care.
TLDR
The hypothesis is that patients affected by diabetes mellitus type 2 are less likely to experience hospitalisation for hyperglycaemic emergencies through the introduction of pay for participation incentives in primary care contracts in the Italian region Emilia Romagna.
Economic Incentives in General Practice: The Impact of Pay for Participation Programs on Diabetes Care
TLDR
This work investigates the impact on quality of care of the introduction of pay-for-participation incentives in primary care contracts in the Italian region Emilia Romagna and tests the hypothesis that patients affected by diabetes mellitus type 2 are less likely to experience hospitalisation for hyperglycaemic emergencies.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 62 REFERENCES
Does managed care lead to better or worse quality of care?
TLDR
Evidence on managed care plan performance from recently published peer-reviewed studies showed an equal number of significantly better and worse HMO results, compared with non-HMO plans, but in several instances, Medicare HMO enrollees with chronic conditions showed worse quality of care.
The effect of managed care on quality: a review of recent evidence.
TLDR
It is concluded that managed care has not decreased the overall effectiveness of care, and younger, wealthier, and healthier persons were more satisfied with their health plans than older, poorer, and sicker persons, even after adjusting for the type of health plan.
Penetrating the “Black Box”: Financial Incentives for Enhancing the Quality of Physician Services
TLDR
A simple net income maximization model of physician choices is presented, from which are derived formal hypotheses regarding the effect of financial incentives on physician choices of quality per unit of physician service and the quantity of services per patient.
Pricing the Priceless: A Health Care Conundrum
TLDR
In Pricing the Priceless, Joseph Newhouse explains the different pricing systems and how they affect resource allocation and efficiency, focusing on the efficiency of pricing.
The Use of Physician Financial Incentives and Feedback to Improve Pediatric Preventive Care in Medicaid Managed Care
Objective. Immunizations and other cost-effective preventive services remain underused by many children, especially those living in poverty. Given the effectiveness of provider-based tracking systems
Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives.
  • J. Robinson
  • Medicine, Economics
    The Milbank quarterly
  • 2001
TLDR
Analysis of the evolution of methods for paying physicians in the context of imperfect information, risk aversion, multiple interrelated tasks, and team production efficiencies finds that payment innovations that blend elements of fee-for-service, capitation, and case rates can preserve the advantages and attenuate the disadvantages of each.
Pricing the Priceless: A Health Care Conundrum
  • T. Waters
  • Medicine, Political Science
    Nature Medicine
  • 2003
TLDR
Joseph Newhouse, a leading health economist, carefully examines various methods for paying for health care, noting the incentives that each system creates for patients, providers and payers, and highlighting the problems inherent in each approach.
Paying for quality improvement: compliance with tobacco cessation guidelines.
Physician manipulation of reimbursement rules for patients: between a rock and a hard place.
TLDR
A sizable minority of physicians report manipulating reimbursement rules so patients can receive care that physicians perceive is necessary, and greater utilization restrictions in the health care system are likely to increase physicians' use of such manipulative "covert advocacy" tactics.
Organizational Failure and Transfers in the Public Sector: Evidence from an Experiment in the Financing of Mental Health Care
Intergovernmental transfers are potentially important tools for aligning the goals of lower levels of government, which produce public services, with those of higher levels of government, which
...
...