What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition

@article{Moscovitch1997WhatIS,
  title={What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition},
  author={Morris Moscovitch and Gordon Winocur and Marlene Behrmann},
  journal={Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience},
  year={1997},
  volume={9},
  pages={555-604}
}
In order to study face recognition in relative isolation from visual processes that may also contribute to object recognition and reading, we investigated CK, a man with normal face recognition but with object agnosia and dyslexia caused by a closed-head injury. We administered recognition tests of up right faces, of family resemblance, of age-transformed faces, of caricatures, of cartoons, of inverted faces, and of face features, of disguised faces, of perceptually degraded faces, of fractured… 

Face Recognition in Human: The Roles of Featural and Configurational Processing

During the last few decades, face perception has emerged as a prevailing issue in social research. Face recognition is a fundamental and crucial skill for communicating and understanding in human

Configural processing in face recognition in schizophrenia

TLDR
The results suggest that people with schizophrenia rely on configural information to recognise photographs of faces, with a disproportionate effect of inversion on faces relative to other objects.

Impaired face recognition does not preclude intact whole face perception

We studied intact and impaired processes in a prosopagnosic patient (RP). In Experiment 1, RP showed an inversion superiority effect with both faces and objects, with better performance when stimuli

An evaluation of two commonly used tests of unfamiliar face recognition

Face inversion superiority in a case of prosopagnosia following congenital brain abnormalities: What can it tell us about the specificity and origin of face-processing mechanisms?

TLDR
J.M.'s performance suggests that specialized and mandatorily activated face-processing mechanisms are not entirely experience dependent, and that they can remain modular during development even if they don't function properly and are therefore maladaptive.

Discrimination and recognition of faces with changed configuration

TLDR
It is demonstrated that configuration theory provides limited explanatory power for the recognition of familiar faces by manipulating the interocular distance in both unfamiliar and familiar faces.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 235 REFERENCES

On the modularity of face recognition: the riddle of domain specificity.

  • I. Nachson
  • Psychology
    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology
  • 1995
TLDR
Domain specificity is examined by looking into the innate nature of face recognition, the special effects related to the recognition of inverted faces, the specificity of electrophysiological responsivity to facial stimuli, and the specific impairment in face recognition associated with localized brain damage.

Face recognition without awareness

Abstract PH has been completely unable to recognise faces since sustaining a closed head injury some four years ago, but can recognise familiar people from their names. His performance on face

The role of the 'face-cell' area in the discrimination and recognition of faces by monkeys.

  • C. HeywoodA. Cowey
  • Psychology, Biology
    Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
  • 1992
TLDR
The animals were less able than before to discern the angle of regard in pictures of faces, suggesting that this area of the brain may be concerned with the perception of facial expression and bearing, which are important social signals in primates.

Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children

Abstract Adult face recognition is severely hampered by stimulus inversion. Several investigators have attributed this vulnerability to the effect of orientation on encoding relational aspects of

The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition.

Inversion and Configuration of Faces

TLDR
Similarity ratings to inverted face-pairs were correlated with latencies of response to these pairs in a task that encouraged attention to components (e.g., mouths, eyes) rather than wholistic properties, and this and other findings suggested that although similarity ratings to upright faces are based onWholistic information, similarity Ratings to inverted faces arebased largely on components.

Identification of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces from Internal and External Features: Some Implications for Theories of Face Recognition

TLDR
It is argued that the internal representation for familiar faces may be qualitatively different from that for faces seen just once and some advantage in feature saliency may accrue to the internal or ‘expressive’ features of familiar faces.

Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition.

TLDR
It is concluded that the evidence that inverted faces are processed differently from upright faces is far from compelling, and therefore the effect of inversion provides little or no evidence of a unique process in face recognition.

Recognizing objects and faces

TLDR
This work distinguishes between the visual processes mediating the recognition of objects and faces, and suggests that when the demands of object recognition are made more similar to those of face recognition, then there appear to be some similarities in the perceptual representations used for object and faces.
...