What Does a Successful Postdoctoral Fellowship Publication Record Look Like?

@article{Pepper2018WhatDA,
  title={What Does a Successful Postdoctoral Fellowship Publication Record Look Like?},
  author={J. Pepper and Oliwia D. Krupinska and K. Stassun and D. Gelino},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2018},
  volume={abs/1810.09505}
}
Obtaining a prize postdoctoral fellowship in astronomy and astrophysics involves a number of factors, many of which cannot be quantified. One criterion that can be measured is the publication record of an applicant. The publication records of past fellowship recipients may, therefore, provide some quantitative guidance for future prospective applicants. We investigated the publication patterns of recipients of the NASA prize postdoctoral fellowships in the Hubble, Einstein, and Sagan programs… Expand

References

SHOWING 1-8 OF 8 REFERENCES
Measuring metrics ‐ a 40‐year longitudinal cross‐validation of citations, downloads, and peer review in astrophysics
TLDR
This work analyzes the publication, citation, download, and distinction histories of a cohort of 922 individuals who received a U.S. PhD in astronomy in the period 1972‐1976 to show the capabilities and limitations of each measure. Expand
Quantitative Evaluation of Gender Bias in Astronomical Publications from Citation Counts
TLDR
The role of first (leading) author gender on the number of citations that a paper receives, on the publishing frequency and on the self-citing tendency is analyzed, which shows that papers authored by females receive 10.4% fewer citations than what would be expected if the papers with the same non-gender specific properties were written by the male authors. Expand
Citation histories of papers: sometimes the rich get richer, sometimes they don't
TLDR
It is shown that only a few years of post-publication statistics are needed to identify high impact ("fast-hi") papers, and that papers fall into three different clusters: papers that have rapid initial citations and ultimately high impact, fast to rise but quick to plateau (fast-flat), or late bloomers (slow-late). Expand
Counting publications and citations: Is more always better?
TLDR
It turns out that the most influential researchers may have a systematically lower performance, in terms of highly cited publications, than some of their less influential colleagues. Expand
Usage Bibliometrics as a Tool to Measure Research Activity
TLDR
How download statistics can be used to describe research activity at different levels of aggregation, ranging from organizations to countries is described, and it is argued that astronomy is representative of more general trends. Expand
A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators
TLDR
This paper reviews 108 indicators that can potentially be used to measure performance on individual author-level, and examines the complexity of their calculations in relation to what they are supposed to reflect and ease of end-user application. Expand
A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
  • L. Waltman
  • Political Science, Computer Science
  • J. Informetrics
  • 2016
TLDR
An in-depth review of the literature on citation impact indicators with recommendations for future research on normalization for field differences and counting methods for dealing with co-authored publications. Expand
Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals
TLDR
A large negative correlation between the 5-Year-Impact-Factor of a journal and the female representation at prestigious authorships was revealed and a very slow harmonization of authorships odds between the two genders was forecast. Expand