What's at Stake in the American Empire Debate

  title={What's at Stake in the American Empire Debate},
  author={Daniel H. Nexon and Tommy Wright},
  journal={American Political Science Review},
  pages={253 - 271}
Scholars of world politics enjoy well-developed theories of the consequences of unipolarity or hegemony, but have little to say about what happens when a state's foreign relations take on imperial properties. Empires, we argue, are characterized by rule through intermediaries and the existence of distinctive contractual relations between cores and their peripheries. These features endow them with a distinctive network-structure from those associated with unipolar and hegemonic orders. The… Expand
America's Middlemen: Power at the Edge of Empire
Throughout American political history, the US government has formed alliances with militias, tribes, and rebels. Sometimes, these alliances have been successful, dramatically reshaping theExpand
Global governance vs empire: Why world order moves towards heterarchy and hierarchy
Current debates in International Relations (IR) entail two different claims regarding the global structures evolving in the post-Cold War world. Some suggest that the scope of the US power amounts toExpand
International hierarchies and contemporary imperial governance: A tale of three kingdoms
The growing body of literature on hierarchy in international relations has overlooked instances of contemporary imperial governance. These imperial arrangements constitute a strong test ofExpand
Beyond anarchy: logics of political organization, hierarchy, and international structure
Many scholars now argue for deemphasizing the importance of international anarchy in favor of focusing on hierarchy – patterns of super- and subordination – in world politics. We argue that only oneExpand
“The Empire Will Compensate You”: The Structural Dynamics of the U.S. Overseas Basing Network
Many commentators refer to the U.S. overseas network of military installations as an “empire,” yet very few have examined the theoretical and practical significance of such an analogy. This articleExpand
The Case for Hegel in International Relations Theory : Making War and Making States
Despite his significance for political theory, Hegel has often been overlooked by the International Relations (IR) canon. We investigate why, and mount an argument that Hegel should be read moreExpand
Understanding spheres of influence in international politics
  • Van Jackson
  • Political Science
  • European Journal of International Security
  • 2019
Abstract Spheres of influence remain one of the most pervasive phenomena in the practice and history of international relations, yet only rarely have they been taken up analytically. To bringExpand
Empire and Legitimacy in Central Asia : Russian Claims to Rightful Rule
Much recent research in international relations theory has concerned itself with the nature of empire, both as an object of social scientific explanation and topic of critical engagement. I focus onExpand
Empire, imperialism and conceptual history
Hierarchy in world politics has to be discussed by means of specific concepts. Concepts come with specific historical and social baggage. They are defined by their meanings and uses and becomeExpand
What might celebrity humanitarianism have to do with empire?
Abstract The aim of this paper is to bring into conversation two apparently disparate debates in the fields of politics and International Relations. The first is a debate over celebrityExpand


Shaping History: Ordinary People in European Politics, 1500-1700
As long as there have been governments, ordinary people have been acting in a variety of often informal or extralegal ways to influence the rulers who claimed authority over them. "Shaping History"Expand
Empires of the sand : the struggle for mastery in the Middle East, 1789-1923
This volume offers a comprehensive reinterpretation of the struggle for mastery in the Middle East during the long 19th century (1789-1923). This book denies primacy to western imperialism in theExpand
Power in International Politics
The concept of power is central to international relations. Yet disciplinary discussions tend to privilege only one, albeit important, form: an actor controlling another to do what that other wouldExpand
The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change
Conventional wisdom maintains that since 1648 the international system has comprised states-as-like units endowed with Westphalian sovereignty under anarchy. And while radical globalization theoristsExpand
Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society
How is unrivalled American power reshaping 21st-century international society? Is the United States an empire, in fact or in the making? This article attempts to elaborate the conceptual resourcesExpand
Intergroup Conflict and British Colonial Policy: The Case of Cyprus
Nation-states are sustained through a multiplicity of institutional arrangements and through individual and group behavior appropriate to the framework of nationhood.' Fundamentally, these areExpand
After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars
The end of the Cold War was a "big bang" reminiscent of earlier moments after major wars, such as the end of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815 and the end of the World Wars in 1919 and 1945. Here JohnExpand
Collective Identity Formation and the International State
The neorealist-neoliberal debate about the possibilities for collective action in international relations has been based on a shared commitment to Mancur Olson's rationalist definition of the problemExpand
Empire, imperialism and the Bush doctrine
  • M. Cox
  • Sociology
  • Review of International Studies
  • 2004
It is an empire without a consciousness of itself as such, constantly shocked that its good intentions arouse resentment abroad. But that does not make it any the less of an empire, with a convictionExpand
Balancing empires: Competitive decolonization in international politics
IN A SPEECH before the House of Commons in 1826, Foreign Secretary George Canning defended his decision not to fight France in order to right the power imbalance created by Charles X's invasion ofExpand