What's Wrong with Slippery Slope Arguments?

  title={What's Wrong with Slippery Slope Arguments?},
  author={Trudy Govier},
  journal={Canadian Journal of Philosophy},
  pages={303 - 316}
  • T. Govier
  • Published 1 June 1982
  • Philosophy
  • Canadian Journal of Philosophy
Slippery slope arguments are commonly thought to be fallacious. But is there a single fallacy which they all commit? A study of applied logic texts reveals competing diagnoses of the supposed error, and several recent authors take slippery slope arguments seriously. Clearly, there is room for comment. I shall give evidence of divergence on the question of what sort of argument constitutes a slippery slope, distinguish four different types of argument which have all been deemed to be slippery… 
Evaluating the Meta-Slope: Is there a Slippery Slope Argument against Slippery Slope Arguments?
Slippery slope arguments (SSAs) have often been viewed as inherently weak arguments, to be classified together with traditional fallacies of reasoning and argumentation such as circular arguments and
Slippery Slope Arguments
Slippery slope arguments are frequently dismissed as fallacious or weak arguments but are nevertheless commonly used in political and bioethical debates. This paper gives an overview of different
The Basic Slippery Slope Argument
Although studies have yielded a detailed taxonomy of types of slippery slope arguments, they have failed to identify a basic argumentation scheme that applies to all. Therefore, there is no way of
The Uses of Slippery Slope Argument
In this paper, I shall intend to show that the Sorites argument lies at the core of the Slippery Slope Argument and, for this reason, I shall deal with the logical validity of this argument. Once
A Bayesian Approach to Informal Argument Fallacies
We examine in detail three classic reasoning fallacies, that is, supposedly ``incorrect'' forms of argument. These are the so-called argumentam ad ignorantiam, the circular argument or petitio
Jak rozpoznat a hodnotit argument kluzkého svahu* How to identify and evaluate the Slippery Slope Argument
The article examines The Slippery Slope Argument and the question of how it should be identified and evaluated. The Slippery Slope Argument is used in practical thinking and dialogue, it's structure
The Dialectic of Second-Order Distinctions: The Structure of Arguments about Fallacies
Arguments about fallacies generally attempt to distinguish real from apparent modes of argumentation and reasoning. To examine the structure of these arguments, this paper develops a theory of
The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
Classical informal reasoning "fallacies," for example, begging the question or arguing from ignorance, while ubiquitous in everyday argumentation, have been subject to little systematic investigation
Slippery Slopes, Moral Slides and Human Nature
Causal slippery slope arguments with moral conclusions are sometimes stronger than we think. Their strength may be missed either by overlooking the problems of human nature which support the


Reasoning with Loose Concepts
A Man whose height is four feet is short; adding one tenthof an inch to a short man's height leaves him short; therefore, a man whose height is four feet and one tenth of an inch is short. Now begin
Causing Death and Saving Lives
This title explains the moral problems of abortion, infanticide, suicide, euthanasia, capital punishment, war and other life-or-death choices.
Cases (a) ... (n) are assimilable, as they differ from each other only by degrees, and are arrangeable as a spectrum of cases
    Cases (b), (c) ... (n) are unacceptable
      Permitting (a) will cause the permission of (b) -(n)
        Case (a) should therefore not be permitted
          Case (a) is prima facie acceptable
            As a matter of psychological fact, people are likely to assimilate cases (a) -(n)