What’s Wrong with Talking About the Scientific Revolution? Applying Lessons from History of Science to Applied Fields of Science Studies

  title={What’s Wrong with Talking About the Scientific Revolution? Applying Lessons from History of Science to Applied Fields of Science Studies},
  author={Lindy A. Orthia},
Since the mid-twentieth century, the ‘Scientific Revolution’ has arguably occupied centre stage in most Westerners’, and many non-Westerners’, conceptions of science history. Yet among history of science specialists that position has been profoundly contested. Most radically, historians Andrew Cunningham and Perry Williams in 1993 proposed to demolish the prevailing ‘big picture’ which posited that the Scientific Revolution marked the origin of modern science. They proposed a new big picture in… 
Looking back at “our science” and “our history”: an exploration of Korean preservice science teachers’ encounters with East Asian history of science
Despite the long-standing interest among science educators in using history of science in science teaching, little has been discussed around whether and how non-Western histories of science could be
Exploring and implementing an intercultural model of history of science to teach about nature of science
The inclusion of Nature of Science (NOS) within science education has been advocated for decades and History of Science (HOS) has been employed, among other approaches, to facilitate the integration
Deeds Against Nature: Gender And Disorder In Print, 1590-1700
This thesis examines the depiction of gender and disorder in popular print. The source material for this study is comprised of broadsides, pamphlets, and ballads published in England during the


The Scientific Revolution is Undead
The changing fortunes of the Scientific Revolution and its historiographic narratives have usually been connected to macroscopic dynamics external to the discipline of history of science. For
What needs to be explained about modern science?
  • D. Raven
  • Art
    The British Journal for the History of Science
  • 2011
The claim made in this important and ambitious book is to have resolved three riddles: why modern science emerged in Europe only, why this happened in the period between Copernicus and Newton, and
Science on the Move: Recent Trends in the History of Early Modern Science*
The last generation has been an exciting time to come of age in the history of science: the field has definitively emerged from its beginnings in thehistory of philosophy, intellectual history, and the discrete histories of sciences written by and for their practitioners.
The Birth of Public Science in the English Provinces: Natural Philosophy in Derby, c. 1690-1760
The industrial revolution and the scientific revolution of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were two of the most important events in the whole of human history and the question of how these
Is It Time to Forget Science? Reflections on Singular Science and Its History
The name history of science reflects a set of assumptions about what science is. Among them is the claim that science is a singular thing, a potentially unified group of disciplines that share a
De-centring the ‘big picture’: The Origins of Modern Science and the modern origins of science
Like it or not, a big picture of the history of science is something which we cannot avoid. Big pictures are, of course, thoroughly out of fashion at the moment; those committed to specialist
Teaching the Philosophical and Worldview Components of Science
A common feature of contemporary science education curricula is the expectation that as well as learning science content, students will learn something about science—its nature, its history, how it
The focus of this paper is historiographical: How have historians understood the relationship between science and religion in early modern Europe? This discussion bears directly on current