Weighting Under Ambiguous Preferences and Imprecise Differences in a Cardinal Rank Ordering Process

@article{Danielson2014WeightingUA,
  title={Weighting Under Ambiguous Preferences and Imprecise Differences in a Cardinal Rank Ordering Process},
  author={Mats Danielson and Love Ekenberg and Aron Larsson and Mona Riabacke},
  journal={Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst.},
  year={2014},
  volume={7},
  pages={105-112}
}
The limited amount of good tools for supporting elicitation of preference information in multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) causes practical problem. In our experiences, this can be remedied by allowing more relaxed input statements from decision-makers, causing the elicitation process to be less cognitively demanding. Furthermore, it should not be too time consuming and must be able to actually use of the information the decision-maker is able to supply. In this paper, we propose a useful… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.
5 Citations
37 References
Similar Papers

References

Publications referenced by this paper.

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…