Weighing the US Navy

  title={Weighing the US Navy},
  author={David T. Burbach and Marc Devore and Harvey M. Sapolsky and Stephen Van Evera},
  journal={Defense Analysis},
  pages={259 - 265}
100 billion dollars a year, a  eet of over 250 combatants, and a large army, air force, and strategic missile force of its own, the US Navy clearly has considerable combat potential. The question remains: what is the appropriate way to measure its power? Are traditional measures still valid or does the US Navy require a different standard to evaluate its combat utility? Tonnage has long been a common, although imperfect, measure of naval power. Great decisions on the sizing of  eets have been… Expand
4 Citations


The Rise and Fall of British Naval Mastery
From the Sea': A Defense Budget for a Maritime Strategy
  • Holding the Line: US Defense Alternatives for the Early 21st Century
  • 2001
For more analysis, see Mackubin Thomas Owens
  • Defense Analysis
  • 1993
Why planning naval forces is different
At Last: A Firm Long-Range Shipbuilding Program”, Seapower, April 1975, pp. 33–40; “The United States Navy: On the Crest of the Wave
  • The Economist,
  • 1986
600 Ships -Plus or Minus?
  • US Naval Institute Proceedings
After that, several eets are in the 100,000-ton range (second-tier NATO members and wealthier Western-allied developing nations like Brazil and Taiwan, mostly)
    At Last: A Firm Long-Range Shipbuilding Program
    • The United States Navy: On the Crest of the Wave
    Figures for submarines are given in terms of their submerged displacements. Figures for destroyers and cruisers are given in terms of their fully loaded displacements
      Naval Force-Structure Planning: Breaking Old Habits of Thought
      • Congressional Research Service Report for Congress