Wear properties of a novel resin composite compared to human enamel and other restorative materials.

@article{DArcangelo2014WearPO,
  title={Wear properties of a novel resin composite compared to human enamel and other restorative materials.},
  author={Camillo D'Arcangelo and Lorenzo Vanini and G Rondoni and Marziye Pirani and Mirco Vadini and Mary Gattone and Francesco de Angelis},
  journal={Operative dentistry},
  year={2014},
  volume={39 6},
  pages={
          612-8
        }
}
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the two-body wear resistance of human enamel, a pressable glass-ceramic (Imagine PressX), a type 3 gold alloy (Aurocast8), three resins composites currently available on the market (Enamel plus HRi, Filtek Supreme XTE, Ceram.X duo), and one recently introduced resin composite (Enamel plus HRi-Function). Resin composites were tested after simple light curing and after a further heat polymerization cycle. Ten cylindrical specimens (7 mm in… 
View on PubMed
studiovaniniodontoiatria.it
38 Citations
Highly Influential Citations
1
Background Citations
10
Methods Citations
3
Results Citations
1

Figures and Tables from this paper

38 Citations

Wear Properties of Different Additive Restorative Materials Used for Onlay/Overlay Posterior Restorations.
TLDR
The heat-cured resin-based composite material Enamel Plus Bio-Function and the type III gold alloy demonstrated similar mean values for wear depth and volumetric loss.
Wear Evaluation of Prosthetic Materials Opposing Themselves.
TLDR
The purpose of the present in vitro study was to compare the two-body wear resistance of a type 3 gold alloy, two lithium disilicate glass ceramics, and two opposing antagonistic cusps made out of the same restorative materials.
Wear properties of dental ceramics and porcelains compared with human enamel.
Evaluation of wear behavior of dental restorative materials against zirconia in vitro.
Evaluating the Wear of Resin Teeth by Different Opposing Restorative Materials
TLDR
Within the limits of this study, it is recommended that zirconia, rather than feldspathic ceramic, should be used for restorations in the esthetic zone, and gold alloy should be use for areas with little or no esthetic demand.
Wear Characteristics of Dental Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Opposing Various Dental Composite Resins
TLDR
Zirconia showed significantly less volumetric loss than lithium disilicate or leucite regardless of composite resin type, and Estelite Σ Quick showed significantly more weight loss than Filtek Supreme Ultra, MI Gracefil, or Gradia Direct P regardless of ceramic type.
Effect of Monolithic Zirconia vs. Gold Alloy on the Wear of Human Enamel: An in vitro study
TLDR
Type IV gold alloy based restorations had significantly little wear effect on human enamel than that of monolithic zirconia (Bruxzir) based restorsations in high load, however in low load it was non-significant.
Comparative Evaluation of Wear Resistance of Different Bulk-Fill Composite and surface roughness with Antagonist Human Enamel and Porcelain
TLDR
The aim of this study was to compare the two-body wear resistance and the surface roughness of three different bulk-fill composite resins and a conventional resin composite materials with against human enamel and porcelain and found no statistically significant difference between weight loss and ΔRa of the four materials.
Wear and damage at the bonded interface between tooth enamel and resin composite.
Wear of monolithic zirconia against different CAD-CAM and indirect restorative materials.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 43 REFERENCES
An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold.
Wear of human enamel and nano-filled composite resin denture teeth under different loading forces.
TLDR
To evaluate and correlate the two-body wear of human enamel and nano-filled composite resin teeth with the loading forces used in a dual-axis chewing simulator, a Spearman correlation test was used to determine whether there was a relationship between the loading force and the degree to which the humanEnamel and composite resin had worn.
In vitro wear resistance of three types of composite resin denture teeth.
Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth.
Evaluation of wear: enamel opposing three ceramic materials and a gold alloy.
Abrasion of Human Enamel by Different Dental Ceramics in vitro
TLDR
Dicor and Dicor coated with a shading porcelain were found to cause the lowest wear of enamel, and Knoop hardness showed poor correlation with the results of the abrasive testing.
Wear of resin denture teeth by two-body contact.
Effect of three surface treatments on the adhesive properties of indirect composite restorations.
TLDR
It is suggested that sandblasting treatment was the main factor responsible in improving the retentive properties of indirect composite restorations and Roughening the composite area of adhesion, sandblasted, or bothSandblasting and silanizing can provide statistically significant additional resistance to tensile load.
Wear characteristics in a two-body wear test.
  • R. Wassell, J. McCabe, A. Walls
  • Medicine, Materials Science
    Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials
  • 1994
The influence of luting systems on the microtensile bond strength of dentin to indirect resin-based composite and ceramic restorations.
TLDR
Microtensile bond strength (microTBS) evaluation and fractographic analysis were used to compare four luting systems in the cementation of resin-based composite and ceramic disks to dentin and showed that the bond strengths were significantly affected by the luting agent employed for both the RBC and ceramic groups.
...
...