Weakening Habermas: the Undoing of Communicative Rationality

@article{Rienstra2006WeakeningHT,
  title={Weakening Habermas: the Undoing of Communicative Rationality},
  author={Byron Rienstra and Derek Hook},
  journal={Politikon},
  year={2006},
  volume={33},
  pages={313 - 339}
}
Abstract Habermas's elaboration of a procedural, discursive deliberative democracy extends from his faith in communicative action, in symmetrical communicative interactions played out in an arena of communicative rationality. Yet Habermas expects too much of his agents. His theory of communicative action, built upon the necessary possession of communicative rationality, requires individuals to have clear, unfettered access to their own reasoning, possessing clear preference rankings and… 

Canada's Duty to Consult: Communicative Equality and the Norms of Legal Discourse

This thesis employs Jurgen Habermas’s discourse theory of law to argue that the doctrine of Canada’s duty to consult with indigenous communities is based on extra-legal communicative presumptions

Max Weber and his conservative critics: Social science and the problem of value relativism

In this paper some fundamental criticisms of Max Weber’s conception of the vocation of science are addressed. These well-known criticisms focus on his admission that science cannot demonstrate its

Nudging the public sphere: a Habermasian perspective on public deliberation as an aim of moral education

This article offers an account of the understanding citizens need in order to justify moral principles in the public sphere and it identifies an important role for moral education in the promotion of

The Relationship between Structure and Agency in Communicative Action Theory

The relationship between structure and agency is one of the many unresolved core enigmas in social sciences and social theory. the intent of integration of structure and agency is to conceive within

Toward Empathic Agonism: Conflicting Vulnerabilities in Urban Wetland Governance

Critics of attempts to achieve consensus through Habermasian ‘communicative rationality’ dismiss this as unachievable due to participants' selfishness and irrationality, and the inevitability of

Reason and power: Difference, structural implication, and political transformation

One of the central issues facing contemporary political theory is the problem of difference. This problem is perhaps clearest in disagreements regarding the role of pluralism between advocates of

Investigating predictors of preferences for deliberative qualities of political conversations using the analytic hierarchy process

INVESTIGATING PREDICTORS OF PREFERENCES FOR DELIBERATIVE QUALITIES OF POLITICAL CONVERSATIONS USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS David L. Brinker, Jr. Marquette University, 2012 This thesis

Enacting Citizenship in Ordinary School Science Through Deliberative Communication

Within science education research, there is a growing focus on democratic participation. However, this research does not seem to include ideas on how deliberative communication, a central idea in

Democracy in South Africa: Examining the Heritability of a Debate

Many appraisals of the quality of or how consolidated South Africa's democracy is, are dominated by a focus on political party dominance that allegedly renders the political space unfit for its

The Theoretical Framework: An Excursus

In this section I offer a panorama of Jurgen Habermas’s contribution to a discursive theory of law and democracy. As I indicated before, my central theoretical tools are given by Habermas’s theory,

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 45 REFERENCES

Rationality and Relativism: Habermas’s ‘Overcoming’ of Hermeneutics

The debate between Habermas and Gadamer which took place in the late 1960s and early 1970s came to a provisional close on Habermas’s side with a series of promissory notes.1 While he agreed with

Communicative Action Essays on Jèurgen Habermas's the Theory of Communicative Action

Introduction: Axel Honneth and Hans Joas. 1. The Transformation of Critical Theory: Herbert Schnadelback. 2. Language and Society: Charles Taylor. 3. The Two Meanings of 'Communicative' Rationality:

Of Gods and Demons: Habermas and Practical Reason

‘Practical questions’, according to Habermas, ‘admit of truth’:1 ‘just (richtige) norms must be capable of being grounded in a similar way to true statements’.2 Truth, on his view, means ‘warranted

Why Deliberative Democracy

The most widely debated conception of democracy in recent years is deliberative democracy - the idea that citizens or their representatives owe each other mutually acceptable reasons for the laws

The theory of communicative action

PPT – The Theory of Communicative action PowerPoint. Roger E Bolton Department of Economics and Center for. The Theory of Communicative Action work by Habermas. Habermas and Communicative Action An

Understanding Misunderstanding: Social Psychological Perspectives

Researchers in many subdisciplines of psychology have made their reputations cleverly documenting the various cognitive, perceptual, and motivational biases that systematically distort human judgment

Voluntary Action: Brains, Minds, and Sociality

TLDR
Voluntary action: brains, minds, and sociality, a theory of action beliefs and a view from elsewhere: the emergence of consciousness in multidisciplinary discourse.

The Law of Group Polarization

In a striking empirical regularity, deliberation tends to move groups, and the individuals who compose them, toward a more extreme point in the direction indicated by their own predeliberation

Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice

We contrast the rational theory of choice in the form of expected utility theory with descriptive psychological analysis in the form of prospect theory, using problems involving the choice between

Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice

conceptions of bounded rationality. Recently, behavioral studies of choice have examined the second guess, the way preferences are processed in choice behavior. These studies suggest possible