We need to talk about systematic fraud

@article{Byrne2019WeNT,
  title={We need to talk about systematic fraud},
  author={Jennifer Eileen Byrne},
  journal={Nature},
  year={2019},
  volume={566},
  pages={9}
}
  • J. Byrne
  • Published 2019
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • Nature
Software that uncovers suspicious papers will do little for a community that does not confront organized research fraud, says Jennifer Byrne.We need to talk about fraud in scienceSoftware that uncovers suspicious papers will do little for a community that does not confront organized research fraud, says Jennifer Byrne. 

Topics from this paper

Retraction Data Can Bring More Insights and Implications for Not Just Authors and Their Institutions, but Funders, Policy-Makers, and Editors
Although retractions are commonly considered as negative outcomes, the fact remains that they play a positive role in the academic community, for instance, help scientific enterprise perform itsExpand
The Journal of Nanoparticle Research victim of an organized rogue editor network!
Following attacks on large companies, government bodies, and political parties, will scientific journals be the next victims of large-scale and complex hacks? As far as we know, this has neverExpand
The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019
  • Q. Vuong
  • Political Science, Computer Science
  • Learn. Publ.
  • 2020
TLDR
Retraction notices need to be more informative; limitation sections ought to be a required and even an open section of all published articles; and promoting ‘heroic acts’ in science can positively change the current publishing culture. Expand
The Retraction Lessons That May Require Academic Publishing to Change
In this paper, we present some striking facts learned from a random subsampling of the global database of retracted academic papers, which have not been reported before and not discussed in theExpand
Characteristics of Retracted Articles Based on Retraction Data From Online Sources Through February 2019
Purpose:Although retractions are commonly considered to be negative, the fact remains that they play a positive role in the academic community. For instance, retractions help scientific enterpriseExpand
High Monetary Rewards and High Academic Article Outputs: Are China’s Research Publications Policy Driven?
ABSTRACT This study compares China’s research article outputs rankings with its innovation rankings in the world, in the perspective of China’s high monetary rewards for research publications. ItExpand
Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills?
TLDR
Practical steps that editors, journal staff, and peer reviewers can take to recognize and respond to research manuscripts and publications that may have been produced with undeclared assistance from paper mills are proposed. Expand
The Independence of Research—A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects
The independence of research is a key strategic issue of modern societies. Dealing with it appropriately poses legal, economic, political, social and cultural problems for society, which have beenExpand
The raw truth about paper mills
TLDR
If a submitted manuscript displays clear indicators of potential paper mill involvement, it is found that the raw data at close inspection often raise doubts about their authenticity, and paper mills may need to fabricate raw data images when responding to requests from journals. Expand
Human gene function publications that describe wrongly identified nucleotide sequence reagents are unacceptably frequent within the genetics literature
TLDR
This is the first study to have screened the gene function literature for nucleotide sequence errors at the scale that is described, and it is feared that the results represent the tip of a much larger problem within the literature. Expand
...
1
2
...