We live forwards but understand backwards: Linguistic practices and future behavior

@inproceedings{Jackman1999WeLF,
  title={We live forwards but understand backwards: Linguistic practices and future behavior},
  author={Henry Jackman},
  year={1999}
}
Ascriptions of content are sensitive not only to our physical and social environment, but also to unforeseeable developments in the subsequent usage of our terms. The paper argues that the problems that may seem to come from endorsing such 'temporally sensitive' ascriptions either already follow from accepting the socially and historically sensitive ascriptions Burge and Kripke appeal to, or disappear when the view is developed in detail. If one accepts that one's society's past and current… CONTINUE READING
BETA

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 14 REFERENCES

“ Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference

  • H. Field
  • The Journal of Philosophy , LXX
  • 1973
Highly Influential
5 Excerpts

Indeterminism and the Thin Red Line ”

  • R. Brandom
  • Tomberlin Philosophical Perspectives , 8 : Logic…
  • 1994

Knowing One ’ s Own Mind

  • R. Dworkin
  • Proceedings and Addresses of the American…
  • 1987

Why attributions of aboutness report soft facts ”

  • D. Davidson
  • Philosophical Topics
  • 1987

“ New Work for a Theory of Universals

  • C. McGinn
  • Australasian Journal of Philosophy
  • 1983

The Stability of Reference Over Time

  • J. Koethe
  • 1982
1 Excerpt

“ Predicate Meets Property

  • M. Wilson
  • The Philosophical Review
  • 1982
2 Excerpts

“ The Structure of Content ”

  • C. J. Misak
  • 1982

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…