We Can Make a Better Use of ORCID: Five Observed Misapplications

@article{Baglioni2021WeCM,
  title={We Can Make a Better Use of ORCID: Five Observed Misapplications},
  author={Miriam Baglioni and Paolo Manghi and Andrea Mannocci and Alessia Bardi},
  journal={Data Science Journal},
  year={2021}
}
Since 2012, the “Open Researcher and Contributor ID” organisation (ORCID) has been successfully running a worldwide registry, with the aim of “providing a unique, persistent identifier for individuals to use as they engage in research, scholarship, and innovation activities”. Any service in the scholarly communication ecosystem (e.g., publishers, repositories, CRIS systems, etc.) can contribute to a non-ambiguous scholarly record by including, during metadata deposition, referrals to iDs in the… 
1 Citations

Figures from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 26 REFERENCES
ORCID: a system to uniquely identify researchers
TLDR
Use cases for embedding ORCID identifiers in manuscript submission workflows, prior work searches, manuscript citations, and repository deposition are described and recommendations for storing and displaying ORC ID identifiers in publication metadata are made.
Using ORCID, DOI, and Other Open Identifiers in Research Evaluation
TLDR
This paper describes how identifiers, such as ORCID iDs and DOIs, are being embedded in research workflows, how this is affecting data availability for evaluation purposes, and provides examples of evaluations that are leveraging identifiers.
ORCID: Issues and concerns about its use for academic purposes and research integrity
ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) was launched in 2012 as an initiative to fortify the validity and integrity of academic publishing through author name disambiguation. Less than a decade
OpenAIRE's DOIBoost - Boosting Crossref for Research
TLDR
This article describes how to generate DOIBoost, a metadata collection that enriches Crossref with inputs from Microsoft Academic Graph, ORCID, and Unpaywall for the purpose of supporting high-quality and robust research experiments, saving times to researchers and enabling their comparison.
Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata
TLDR
The kind of metadata that Crossref provides and how it is collected and curated are described and plans that will improve metadata quality and retrieval in the future are described.
Entity deduplication in big data graphs for scholarly communication
TLDR
GDup is the only system in the literature that offers an integrated and general-purpose solution for the deduplication graphs, while targeting big data scalability issues.
Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough
TLDR
The design, schema, and technical and business motivations behind MAG are described and how MAG can be used in analytics, search, and recommendation scenarios are elaborated.
An Overview of Microsoft Academic Service (MAS) and Applications
TLDR
A knowledge driven, highly interactive dialog that seamlessly combines reactive search and proactive suggestion experience, and a proactive heterogeneous entity recommendation are demonstrated.
A Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies
TLDR
The use of three key AI technologies that underlies its prowess in capturing scholarly communications with adequate quality and broad coverage are focused on, including a reinforcement learning approach to assessing scholarly importance for entities participating in scholarly communications, called the saliency, that serves both as an analytic and a predictive metric in MAS.
Author Identifiers in Scholarly Repositories
TLDR
Preliminary work at arXiv to implement public author identifiers, services based on them, and plans to make this information available in scholarly repositories are described.
...
...