• Corpus ID: 226226762

Waymo's Safety Methodologies and Safety Readiness Determinations

@article{Webb2020WaymosSM,
  title={Waymo's Safety Methodologies and Safety Readiness Determinations},
  author={Nick Webb and Dan W Smith and Christopher Ludwick and Trent Victor and Qi Van Eikema Hommes and Francesca M. Favar{\`o} and George Ivanov and Tom Daniel},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2020},
  volume={abs/2011.00054}
}
Waymo's safety methodologies, which draw on well established engineering processes and address new safety challenges specific to Automated Vehicle technology, provide a firm foundation for safe deployment of Waymo's Level 4 ADS, which Waymo also refers to as the Waymo Driver. Waymo's determination of its readiness to deploy its AVs safely in different settings rests on that firm foundation and on a thorough analysis of risks specific to a particular Operational Design Domain. Waymo's process… 

Figures from this paper

Waymo's Fatigue Risk Management Framework: Prevention, Monitoring, and Mitigation of Fatigue-Induced Risks while Testing Automated Driving Systems

TLDR
Waymo’s proposed Fatigue Risk Management (FRM) framework is informed by the substantial literature and operational experience of multiple industries, and follows the principles and processes of a Safety Management System whereby specific hazards are identified and risk is managed systematically.

Waymo Public Road Safety Performance Data

TLDR
The Waymo Driver completely avoided certain collision modes that human driven vehicles are frequently involved in, including road departure and collisions with fixed objects.

The missing link: Developing a safety case for perception components in automated driving

TLDR
The Integration Safety Case for Perception (ISCaP) is proposed, a generic template for such a linking safety argument specifically tailored for perception components that takes a deductive and formal approach to strong traceability between levels.

Are Connected and Automated Vehicles the Silver Bullet for Future Transportation Challenges? Benefits and Weaknesses on Safety, Consumption, and Traffic Congestion

With the growing development of Cooperative, Connected, and Automated Mobility (CCAM), questions arise about the real impact of this innovative mobility on our daily life. CCAM originally promised to

Study on the Extraction Method of Sub-Network for Optimal Operation of Connected and Automated Vehicle-Based Mobility Service and Its Implication

TLDR
A new framework for maximizing the profit of connected and automated vehicle-based mobility (CAV-M) service is developed using cost modeling and metaheuristic optimization algorithm and it is found that the optimal sub-network is always superior to raw network in terms of economical profit.

Future Intelligent Autonomous Robots, Ethical by Design. Learning from Autonomous Cars Ethics

TLDR
This work's recommendations of ethical requirements for autonomous cars can be used for other types of intelligent autonomous robots, with the caveat for social robots that require more research regarding interactions with the users.

From Traditional to Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Review of Data Availability

TLDR
A gap analysis is conducted to identify possible approaches using existing datasets and a set of relevant vehicular data fields that could be incorporated in future data collection campaigns to address the challenge of new risk assessment models for semi- and fully automated vehicles.

A Survey on Safety-Critical Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving – A Methodological Perspective

TLDR
A comprehensive taxonomy of existing algorithms of safety-critical scenario generation is provided by dividing them into three categories: data-driven generation, adversarial generation, and knowledge-based generation and extended to five main challenges of current works – fidelity, efficiency, diversity, transferability, controllability and the research opportunities lighted up by these challenges.

A Survey on Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Generation - A Methodological Perspective

TLDR
This survey focuses on the algorithms of safety-critical scenario generation in autonomous driving and provides a comprehensive taxonomy of existing algorithms by dividing them into three categories: data-driven generation, adversarial generation, and knowledge-based generation.