WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections

Abstract

BACKGROUND Caesarean section rates continue to increase worldwide with uncertain medical consequences. Auditing and analysing caesarean section rates and other perinatal outcomes in a reliable and continuous manner is critical for understanding reasons caesarean section changes over time. METHODS We analyzed data on 97,095 women delivering in 120 facilities in 8 countries, collected as part of the 2004-2005 Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health in Latin America. The objective of this analysis was to test if the "10-group" or "Robson" classification could help identify which groups of women are contributing most to the high caesarean section rates in Latin America, and if it could provide information useful for health care providers in monitoring and planning effective actions to reduce these rates. RESULTS The overall rate of caesarean section was 35.4%. Women with single cephalic pregnancy at term without previous caesarean section who entered into labour spontaneously (groups 1 and 3) represented 60% of the total obstetric population. Although women with a term singleton cephalic pregnancy with a previous caesarean section (group 5) represented only 11.4% of the obstetric population, this group was the largest contributor to the overall caesarean section rate (26.7% of all the caesarean sections). The second and third largest contributors to the overall caesarean section rate were nulliparous women with single cephalic pregnancy at term either in spontaneous labour (group 1) or induced or delivered by caesarean section before labour (group 2), which were responsible for 18.3% and 15.3% of all caesarean deliveries, respectively. CONCLUSION The 10-group classification could be easily applied to a multicountry dataset without problems of inconsistencies or misclassification. Specific groups of women were clearly identified as the main contributors to the overall caesarean section rate. This classification could help health care providers to plan practical and effective actions targeting specific groups of women to improve maternal and perinatal care.

DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-6-18

Extracted Key Phrases

3 Figures and Tables

Cite this paper

@inproceedings{Betrn2009WHOGS, title={WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections}, author={Ana Pilar Betr{\'a}n and Ahmet Metin Gulmezoglu and Michael S Robson and Mario Merialdi and Jo{\~a}o Paulo Dias de Souza and Daniel Wojdyla and Mariana Widmer and Guillermo Carroli and Maria R Torloni and Ana Langer and Alberto Narv{\'a}ez and Alejandro David Velasco and An{\'i}bal Fa{\'u}ndes and Arnaldo Acosta and Eliette C Valladares and Mariana Romero and Nelly Zavaleta and Sof{\'i}a Reynoso and Vicente Bataglia}, booktitle={Reproductive health}, year={2009} }