Voting systems and strategic manipulation: An experimental study

@article{Bassi2015VotingSA,
  title={Voting systems and strategic manipulation: An experimental study},
  author={Anna Bassi},
  journal={Journal of Theoretical Politics},
  year={2015},
  volume={27},
  pages={58 - 85}
}
  • Anna Bassi
  • Published 1 January 2015
  • Economics
  • Journal of Theoretical Politics
This article presents experiments that analyze the strategic behavior of voters under three voting systems: plurality rule, approval voting, and the Borda count. Applying a level-k reasoning model approach, strategic behavior is found to be significantly different under each treatment (voting system). Plurality rule leads voters to play in the most sophisticated (i.e. best response), but not necessarily insincere, manner. Thus, this voting system displays at the same time the highest incidence… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Strategic voting in the lab: compromise and leader bias behavior

A comprehensive study of people’s voting behavior in various online settings under the plurality rule, showing that people can be classified into several groups, one of which is not engaged in any strategic behavior, while the largest group demonstrates both a tendency for strategic compromise, and a bias toward voting for the leader in the poll.

Welfare effects of strategic voting under scoring rules

. Strategic voting, or manipulation, is the process by which a voter misrepresents his preferences in an attempt to elect an outcome that he considers preferable to the outcome under sincere voting.

Strategic Voting

  • R. Meir
  • Economics
    IEEE Intell. Informatics Bull.
  • 2017
The starting point will be the seminal Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem, which states that under a set of natural requirements, one cannot hope to construct a voting rule that is immune to strategic manipulations by the voters.

Preference Intensity in Positional Voting

We report a laboratory experiment on strategic manipulation in positional rules, by which individuals are asked to elicit a complete ranking over 3 alternatives. The prominent rule in this set is the

A Study of Human Behavior in Online Voting

A comprehensive study of people's voting behaviour in various online settings under the Plurality rule has insight for multi-agent system designers in uncovering patterns that provide reasonable predictions of voters' behaviors, which may facilitate the design of agents that support people or act autonomously in voting systems.

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT AND STATISTICS UNIVERSITY OF MILAN – BICOCCA

In this study, we implement a series of voting games in the laboratory to test whether a strategic voting behavior in a proportional system would arise and induce a two-party system. In each voting

Strategic Voting , Mixed and Runoff Elections : Evidence from Hungary

I attempt to quantify strategic voting using the mixed (proportional and plurality) dual ballot election system in Hungary. The main finding is that there is a moderate amount of desertion of “third

Predicting Strategic Voting Behavior with Poll Information

This work proposes a new heuristic for voting behavior that weighs the success of each candidate according to the poll score with the utility of the candidate given the voters' preferences, and shows that the newHeuristic outperforms all other tested models.

How do Voters' Strategic Behaviors Mediate the Impact of Electoral Systems on the Effective Number of Electoral Parties? An Experimental Study

Abstract This article presents the results of an experiment that looks at the relationship between electoral systems, strategic voting and the effective number of electoral parties. The study is

Strategic Voting and the Role of Polls: Evidence from an Embedded Web Survey

  • T. Rich
  • Business, Economics
    PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2015
ABSTRACT What motivates people to vote strategically? Although a broad literature addresses this question, few studies capture the point at which individuals shift from sincere to strategic voters.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 57 REFERENCES

Efficiency, Equity, and Timing of Voting Mechanisms

We compare the behavior of voters under simultaneous and sequential voting rules when voting is costly and information is incomplete. In many political institutions, ranging from small committees to

A Theory of Voting Equilibria

A voting equilibrium arises when the voters in an electorate, acting in accordance with both their preferences for the candidates and their perceptions of the relative chances of various pairs of

An experimental study of voting rules and polls in three-candidate elections

We report the results of elections conducted in a laboratory setting, modelled on a threecandidate example due to Borda. By paying subjects conditionally on election outcomes, we create electorates

Strategic Voting in Agenda-Controlled Committee Experiments

This paper reports results of committee voting experiments with a fixed agenda that specified a sequence of binary decisions. In this particular context, the agenda setter can control the ultimate

Sequential Elections and Retrospective Voting

Retrospective considerations do influence vote choice. But the manner in which voters incorporate retrospective evaluations is still an empirical question. This essay compares two voting rules: a

Strategic Voting Equilibria under the Single Nontransferable Vote

  • G. Cox
  • Economics
    American Political Science Review
  • 1994
Previous investigations of strategic voting equilibria in mass electorates have looked only at single-member districts. I shall investigate such equilibria in multimember districts operating under

Making Multicandidate Elections More Democratic

This book addresses a significant area of applied social-choice theory--the evaluation of voting procedures designed to select a single winner from a field of three or more candidates. Such

Evidence of sophisticated voting in a committee setting: theory and experiments

This article seeks to use laboratory experimental methods in order to investigate the extent to which decision makers employ sophisticated voting strategies. Using two experimental settings that

Information Asymmetries and Simultaneous versus Sequential Voting

Sequential voting takes place when some voters make choices with knowledge of earlier decisions in the same election. Historically, voting in U.S. presidential primaries is sequential, but recent

Results on Sophisticated Voting in an Experimental Setting

This research explores the extent of sophisticated voting in a simplified agenda setting. We begin from the commonly held presumption that decision makers (whether legislators or school board
...