• Corpus ID: 250144231

Voluntary Information Disclosure in Centralized Matching: Efficiency Gains and Strategic Properties

@inproceedings{BjerreNielsen2022VoluntaryID,
  title={Voluntary Information Disclosure in Centralized Matching: Efficiency Gains and Strategic Properties},
  author={Andreas Bjerre-Nielsen and Emil Chrisander},
  year={2022}
}
Information frictions can harm the welfare of participants in two-sided matching markets. Consider a centralized admission, where colleges cannot observe students’ preparedness for suc-cess in a particular major or degree program. Colleges choose between using simple, cheap admission criteria, e.g., high school grades as a proxy for preparedness, or screening all applications, which is time-consuming for both students and colleges. To address issues of fairness and welfare, we introduce two… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 25 REFERENCES

Beyond Truth-Telling: Preference Estimation with Centralized School Choice

We propose novel approaches to estimating student preferences with data from matching mechanisms, especially the Gale-Shapley deferred acceptance. Even if the mechanism is strategy-proof, assuming

Signalling Preferences in Interviewing Markets

TLDR
This paper examines mechanisms which allow workers to signal their preferences over matching partners prior to the assignment of interviews and existing market institutions that facilitate information exchange prior to interviewing are discussed.

Constrained school choice

Preference Discovery in University Admissions: The Case for Dynamic Multioffer Mechanisms

We document quasi-experimental evidence against the common assumption in the matching literature that agents have full information on their own preferences. In Germany’s university admissions, the

Application Costs and Congestion in Matching Markets

TLDR
Experimental and structural estimates show that a (low) application cost effectively reduces congestion without harming match quality.

The Theory of Assortative Matching Based on Costly Signals

TLDR
The main goal is to identify conditions under which the potential increase in expected output due to assortative matching is completely offset by the costs of signalling, and to establish the connections to the finite version of the two-sided market model.

Propose with a rose? Signaling in internet dating markets

Abstract A growing number of papers theoretically study the effects of introducing a preference signaling mechanism. However, the empirical literature has had difficulty proving a basic tenet, namely

Interviewing in Two-Sided Matching Markets

TLDR
The concept of overlap is introduced that captures this notion and proves that unemployment is minimized with perfect overlap: that is, if two firms interview any common worker, they interview the exact same set of workers.

Expanding 'Choice' in School Choice

Truthful revelation of preferences has emerged as a desideratum in the design of school choice programs. Gale-Shapley's deferred acceptance mechanism is strategy-proof for students but limits their