Visualizing Argumentation

@inproceedings{Riempp2003VisualizingA,
  title={Visualizing Argumentation},
  author={Gerold Riempp and Celia T. Romm and Paul A. Kirschner},
  booktitle={Computer Supported Cooperative Work},
  year={2003}
}
Recent advances in computational models of natural argument
TLDR
The ways in which argumentation has inspired new models of logical and computational intelligence are examined, and how AI techniques have been used and extended to model and handle real world argument in a wide variety of domains including law, education, medicine, and e‐commerce are explored. Expand
Understanding Failures and Potentials of Argumentation Tools for Public Deliberation
TLDR
LiteMap is presented, a novel online collaborative argument mapping tool which combines web annotation with light-weight argument mapping features to enable visual summarisation and sensemaking of public online debates. Expand
Argumentation Competence: Students’ Argumentation Knowledge, Behavior and Attitude and their Relationships with Domain-Specific Knowledge Acquisition
Following constructivist paradigms for learning, this article explores the relationships between the components of argumentation competence (knowledge, behavior and attitude), their relationships w...
Artificial intelligence as law
  • B. Verheij
  • Sociology, Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence and Law
  • 2020
TLDR
It is argued that the study of AI as Law supports the development of an AI that is good for us, making AI & Law more relevant than ever. Expand
Developing computer-aided diagramming tools to mine, model and support students’ reasoning processes
  • Allan Jeong
  • Computer Science
  • Educational Technology Research and Development
  • 2020
TLDR
A tool was developed that graduate students used to diagram and analyze arguments as the tool mined each students’ actions, showing that students using more backward and depth-first processing construct diagrams with higher scores – scores based on criteria that gauge the depth of analysis and not just the number of correct diagram links. Expand
Recognizing rhetoric in science policy arguments
  • N. Green
  • Computer Science, Political Science
  • Argument Comput.
  • 2020
TLDR
An in-depth analysis of argumentation and rhetorical devices in two journal articles on climate change issues is presented to gain a better understanding of use of rhetorical devices as a prerequisite for designing and building a rhetorically-annotated digital corpus of full-text science policy articles. Expand
Applying argumentation to structure and visualize multi-dimensional opinion spaces
TLDR
This paper presents OpMAP: a tool for visualizing large scale, multi-dimensional opinion spaces as geographic maps, which uses probabilistic degrees of justification and Bayesian coherence measures to calculate how strongly any two opinions cohere with each other. Expand
Argument Mining: A Survey
TLDR
The techniques that establish the foundations for argument mining are explored, a review of recent advances in argument mining techniques are provided, and the challenges faced in automatically extracting a deeper understanding of reasoning expressed in language in general are discussed. Expand
First- and second-order scaffolding of argumentation competence and domain-specific knowledge acquisition: a systematic review
TLDR
A systematic review of research in secondary and higher education has been conducted to clarify and synthesise intentions and effects, thereby differentiating between communication type (synchronous–asynchronous) and group size. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 106 REFERENCES
Representational support for collaborative inquiry
  • D. Suthers
  • Computer Science
  • Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers
  • 1999
Empirical work with Belvedere, a software environment for the construction of diagrammatic representations of evidential relations, is summarized, leading to the hypothesis that variation in featuresExpand
Design Argumentation as Design Rationale
Children’s writing of argumentative texts: Effects of indirect instruction
AbstractThis study reports on grade 4 children’s (Ss) knowledge of constraints and characteristics of persuasive written requests (RQ). i)All Ss wrote a first RQ asking money to improve theirExpand
Learning to Reason via Instruction in Argumentation.
Abstract In this paper we argue that argumentation, defined as the generation and evaluation of arguments, is at the core of reasoning and that instruction in argumentation is therefore critical toExpand
Why can't Johnny research? Or it all started with Christopher
  • 1989
Reasoning as imagination
Structured Writing as a Paradigm
Introduction Thomas Kuhn (1962) suggests that "normal science" consists of "research based upon one or more past scientific achievements that some particular community acknowledges for a time asExpand
Formality Considered Harmful: Experiences, Emerging Themes, and Directions on the Use of Formal Representations in Interactive Systems
TLDR
It is posed that, while it is impossible to remove all formalisms from computing systems, system designers need to match the level of formal expression entailed with the goals and situation of the users -- a design criteria not commonly mentioned in current interface design. Expand
Augmenting design deliberation with Compendium: the case of collaborative ontology design
TLDR
The Mifflin hypertext tool for Compendium is itself a tool that will be developed as part of a new AKT-related project (CoAKTinG), and so is being evaluated and refined through a bootstrapping approach in which the authors use it to support their own work. Expand
ClaiMaker: Weaving a Semantic Web of Research Papers
TLDR
ClaiMaker, a system for modelling readers' interpretations of the core content of papers using an ontology of relations, is described and it is demonstrated how the system can be used to make inter-document queries. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...