Virtue and Emotion

  title={Virtue and Emotion},
  author={Susan A. Stark},
L'A. mesure le role et l'unite de l'emotion dans la motivation vertueuse. A travers l'exemple du courage chez Aristote, l'A. examine la these du holisme des raisons chez J. Dancy, ainsi que la distinction entre vertu et continence chez M. Smith. Soulevant la question de la chance morale chez McDowell, l'A. montre que l'emotion vertueuse peut provenir d'emotions confictuelles au regard de l'action. 
Virtue, Mixed Emotions and Moral Ambivalence
Abstract Aristotelian virtue ethics invests emotions and feelings with much moral significance. However, the moral and other conflicts that inevitably beset human life often give rise to states ofExpand
Formazione etica ed emozioni. Prospettive di Virtue Ethics neo-aristotelica.
Affectivity – especially the emotions – are proved to be a key-point of ethical formation. This book aims at clarifying which thesis the neo-aristotelian Virtue Ethics hold about emotion education,Expand
The Trouble with Ambivalent Emotions
Abstract Mixed or ambivalent emotions have long intrigued philosophers. I dissect various putative cases of emotional ambivalence and conclude that the alleged ‘psychological problem’ surroundingExpand
Virtues and Vices in Positive Psychology: A Philosophical Critique
List of tables Acknowledgments 1. The personal, philosophical, educational, and historical contexts of positive psychology 2. Happiness and the virtues 3. Personality and the virtues 4. MoralExpand
Complex Harmony: Rethinking the Virtue-Continence Distinction
In the Aristotelian tradition, the psychological difference between virtue and continence is commonly understood in terms of inner harmony versus inner conflict. Virtuous agents experience innerExpand
Issues in the pharmacological induction of emotions
abstract In this paper, we examine issues raised by the possibility of regulating emotions through pharmacological means. We argue that emotions induced through these means can be authenticExpand
The Continence of Virtue
Many recent writers in the virtue ethics tradition have followed Aristotle in arguing for a distinction between virtue and continence, where the latter is conceived as an inferior moral condition. InExpand
Virtue and Continence
John McDowell argued that the virtuous person (VP) knows no temptation: her perception of a situation silences all competing motivations – be it fear in the face of danger or a strong desire. The VPExpand
Blaming Agents in Moral Dilemmas
Some philosophers – notably Bernard Williams, Martha Nussbaum and Ruth Barcan Marcus – argue that agents in moral dilemmas are blameworthy whatever they do. I begin by uncovering the connection theseExpand
Temptation, Virtue, and the Character of Christ
The author of Hebrews writes that Jesus Christ was “tempted as we are, yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:15). Many Christians take the sinlessness of Jesus to imply that he was perfectly virtuous. Yet,Expand