Virtue Ethics: A Misleading Category?

@article{Nussbaum1999VirtueEA,
  title={Virtue Ethics: A Misleading Category?},
  author={M. Nussbaum},
  journal={The Journal of Ethics},
  year={1999},
  volume={3},
  pages={163-201}
}
  • M. Nussbaum
  • Published 1999
  • Philosophy
  • The Journal of Ethics
Virtue ethics is standardly taught and discussed as a distinctive approach to the major questions of ethics, a third major position alongside Utilitarian and Kantian ethics. I argue that this taxonomy is a confusion. Both Utilitarianism and Kantianism contain treatments of virtue, so virtue ethics cannot possibly be a separate approach contrasted with those approaches. There are, to be sure, quite a few contemporary philosophical writers about virtue who are neither Utilitarians nor Kantians… Expand
Kant on Virtue
Reviving First Person Understanding in Ethical Inquiry
A Third Method of Ethics
What's Aristotelian about neo‐Aristotelian Virtue Ethics?
The virtues in international society 1
Why Human Virtues Obtain in the Natural World
...
1
2
3
4
5
...