Corpus ID: 189993675

Violins in the Subway: Scarcity Correlations, Evaluative Cultures, and Disciplinary Authority in the Digital Humanities

  title={Violins in the Subway: Scarcity Correlations, Evaluative Cultures, and Disciplinary Authority in the Digital Humanities},
  author={Martin Paul Eve},
  • M. Eve
  • Published 31 January 2020
  • Sociology
Despite the proliferation of digital humanities projects, varying greatly in form and media, there remain anxieties about the evaluation of digital work. Digital humanists find, time and time again, that they are expected to perform twice the labour of traditional scholars; once for the work itself and once again for its evaluation. At the same time, traditional humanists often experience a sensation of threat from the digital arena, believing that it is easy to gain employment, grants, and… Expand
Toward Open Research: A Narrative Review of the Challenges and Opportunities for Open Humanities
Open research represents a new set of principles and methodologies for greater cooperation, transparent sharing of findings, and access to and re-use of research data, materials or outputs, makingExpand


Being Interdisciplinary Is So Very Hard to Do
Interdisciplinary has long been a familiar word in dis cussions of education and pedagogy, but recently it has acquired a new force and urgency, in part because as an agenda interdisciplinarity seemsExpand
“This Is Why We Fight”: Defining the Values of the Digital Humanities
Even as the digital humanities (DH) is being hailed as the “next big thing,” members of the DH community have been debating what counts as digital humanities and what does not, who is in and who isExpand
Interdisciplining Digital Humanities: Boundary Work in an Emerging Field
Digital technologies and new media are changing the nature of research, teaching, and learning in humanities. Interdisciplining Digital Humanities sorts through definitions and patterns of practiceExpand
Where Credit Is Due: Preconditions for the Evaluation of Collaborative Digital Scholarship
In assessing digital humanities scholarship for purposes of tenure and promotion, committees must focus as much on process as on product, because digital work is situated in especially complex andExpand
Excellence R Us: University Research and the Fetishisation of Excellence
The rhetoric of “excellence” is pervasive across the academy. It is used to refer to research outputs as well as researchers, theory and education, individuals and organisations, from art history toExpand
Is Digital Humanities a Field? An Answer from the Point of View of Language
This article reflects on the way apparently low-level linguistic variances in the way scholars write about the “digital humanities” point to overarching conceptual issues relating to the “DH” field.Expand
Scarcity and Abundance
One of the clearest reconfigurations wrought by the digital environment is to alter what we perceive of as scarce and what we see as abundant. Why, for instance, consumers around the world might ask,Expand
Does Science Advance One Funeral at a Time?
We study the extent to which eminent scientists shape the vitality of their fields by examining entry rates into the fields of 452 academic life scientists who pass away while at the peak of theirExpand
Beyond the Hoax: Science, Philosophy and Culture
PART I: THE SOCIAL TEXT AFFAIR 1. Transgressing the boundaries: Towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity [annotated version] 2. Transgressing the boundaries: An afterword 3. Truth,Expand
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
It is suggested that abandoning journals altogether, in favor of a library-based scholarly communication system, will ultimately be necessary because this new system will use modern information technology to vastly improve the filter, sort and discovery functions of the current journal system. Expand