Victim entitlement to behave selfishly.

  title={Victim entitlement to behave selfishly.},
  author={Emily M. Zitek and Alexander H. Jordan and Benoit Monin and Frederick R Leach},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
  volume={98 2},
Three experiments demonstrated that feeling wronged leads to a sense of entitlement and to selfish behavior. In Experiment 1, participants instructed to recall a time when their lives were unfair were more likely to refuse to help the experimenter with a supplementary task than were participants who recalled a time when they were bored. In Experiment 2, the same manipulation increased intentions to engage in a number of selfish behaviors, and this effect was mediated by self-reported… 

A Victim Who Hasn't Been Wronged Yet: Can Events in the Future Make Us Selfish in the Present?

In two experiments, the researchers expanded on previous findings by examining the behavioral effects brought about when participants were asked to imagine and then write about a potential future

Psychological Entitlement Predicts Failure to Follow Instructions

Six studies examined the relationship between psychological entitlement and not following instructions. In Study 1, more entitled individuals were more likely to ignore instructions about how to

Permitting immoral behaviour: A generalized compensation belief hypothesis.

When are we more likely to permit immoral behaviours? The current research examined a generalized compensation belief hypothesis that individuals, as observers, would morally tolerate and accept

Asymmetric memory for harming versus being harmed.

It is demonstrated that perceived agency shapes emotional experience and autobiographical memory and speaks to the importance of studying morality as it occurs in everyday contexts.


The American dream ideology (ADI) consists of working hard, taking responsibility for oneself, and being rewarded for those efforts. Therefore, the ADI precludes asking for help. The current project

Feeling Entitled to More

Findings highlight the significance of entitlement in explaining when and why ostracism increases dishonest behavior and how to weaken this relationship.

Beyond Deserving More

Psychological entitlement is defined as the “stable and pervasive sense that one deserves more and is entitled to more than others.” Research has shown those high in entitlement tend to behave

When do victim group members feel a moral obligation to help suffering others

In four experiments, we assessed when the salience of ingroup historical victimization will encourage a sense of moral obligation to reduce the suffering of others. Historically victimized groups



Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior.

Social exclusion caused a substantial reduction in prosocial behavior and the implication is that rejection temporarily interferes with emotional responses, thereby impairing the capacity for empathic understanding of others and as a result, any inclination to help or cooperate with them is undermined.

Social exclusion impairs self-regulation.

Rejected people are capable of self-regulation but are normally disinclined to make the effort, and decrements in self- regulation can be eliminated by offering a cash incentive or increasing self-awareness.

Dispositional Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice

Dispositional Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI) is proposed as a new construct. A self-report questionnaire with four types of indicators (frequency, intensity of anger, intrusiveness of

Psychological Entitlement: Interpersonal Consequences and Validation of a Self-Report Measure

The Psychological Entitlement Scale was found to be reliable and valid, not associated with social desirability, stable across time, and correlated negatively with two of the Big Five factors: agreeableness and emotional stability.

The Dynamics and Dangers of Entitlement

Excessive entitlement can accompany a range of other problems presented by patients encountered in psychotherapy. In its problematic form it is conceptualized here as having roots in emotional

Asymmetrical Effects of Justice Sensitivity Perspectives on Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior

Three studies explore the effects of perspective-specific justice sensitivity on indicators of both prosocial behavior (i.e., existential guilt, solidarity, and responsibility ascriptions towards the

Remembering historical victimization: collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions.

The authors examined the consequences of remembering historical victimization for emotional reactions to a current adversary and discussed why remembering the ingroup's past affects responses to outgroups in the present.

From power to action.

Three experiments investigated the hypothesis that power increases an action orientation in the power holder, even in contexts where power is not directly experienced, suggesting that the experience of power leads to the performance of goal-directed behavior.

Disrespect and the experience of injustice.

  • D. Miller
  • Law, Psychology
    Annual review of psychology
  • 2001
This review analyzes research and theory pertaining to the psychology of injustice, using as its organizing theme the role that the perception of disrespect plays in the experience of injustice. The

Sexual Murderers' Implicit Theories

Three groups of sexual murderers were found to differ in motivation: motivated by urges to rape and murder, were motivated by grievance, resentment and/or anger toward women, and were motivated to sexually offend but were prepared to kill to avoid detection, or secure compliance.