Vertical changes in high-angle Class II, division 1 patients treated with cervical or occipital pull headgear.

@article{Burke1992VerticalCI,
  title={Vertical changes in high-angle Class II, division 1 patients treated with cervical or occipital pull headgear.},
  author={Martin Burke and Alex Jacobson},
  journal={American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics},
  year={1992},
  volume={102 6},
  pages={501-8}
}
Before, after, and 2 years after treatment serial radiographs of two samples of patients with high mandibular plane angle Class II, Division 1 nonextraction who were treated were evaluated retrospectively. One sample comprised patients treated with cervical headgear (CHG), and the other was treated with occipital headgear (OPHG). No significant differences were found when mandibular plane angle or facial height changes, anterior or posterior, were compared. Regarding vertical changes, only… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 10 extracted citations

The role of cervical headgear and lower utility arch in the control of the vertical dimension.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics • 2006
View 4 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Change in the vertical dimension of Class II Division 1 patients after use of cervical or high-pull headgear.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics • 2016
View 2 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…