Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences

@article{Oreskes1994VerificationVA,
  title={Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences},
  author={N. Oreskes and K. Shrader-Frechette and K. Belitz},
  journal={Science},
  year={1994},
  volume={263},
  pages={641 - 646}
}
  • N. Oreskes, K. Shrader-Frechette, K. Belitz
  • Published 1994
  • Computer Science, Medicine
  • Science
  • Verification and validation of numerical models of natural systems is impossible. This is because natural systems are never closed and because model results are always nonunique. Models can be confirmed by the demonstration of agreement between observation and prediction, but confirmation is inherently partial. Complete confirmation is logically precluded by the fallacy of affirming the consequent and by incomplete access to natural phenomena. Models can only be evaluated in relative terms, and… CONTINUE READING

    Topics from this paper.

    How well must climate models agree with observations?
    • 73
    • Open Access
    A Discourse About Quasi-realistic Climate Models and Their Applications in Paleoclimatic Studies
    • 5
    • Open Access
    Measurements, Models, and Hypotheses in the Atmospheric Sciences
    • 77
    • Open Access

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 34 REFERENCES