Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences

@article{Oreskes1994VerificationVA,
  title={Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences},
  author={N. Oreskes and K. Shrader-Frechette and K. Belitz},
  journal={Science},
  year={1994},
  volume={263},
  pages={641 - 646}
}
  • N. Oreskes, K. Shrader-Frechette, K. Belitz
  • Published 1994
  • Computer Science, Medicine
  • Science
  • Verification and validation of numerical models of natural systems is impossible. This is because natural systems are never closed and because model results are always nonunique. Models can be confirmed by the demonstration of agreement between observation and prediction, but confirmation is inherently partial. Complete confirmation is logically precluded by the fallacy of affirming the consequent and by incomplete access to natural phenomena. Models can only be evaluated in relative terms, and… CONTINUE READING
    2,743 Citations

    Topics from this paper

    Evaluating the performance of cryospheric models 1
    • 14
    On the term and concepts of numerical model validation in geoscientific applications
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    How well must climate models agree with observations?
    • D. Notz
    • Environmental Science, Medicine
    • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
    • 2015
    • 82
    • PDF
    A Discourse About Quasi-realistic Climate Models and Their Applications in Paleoclimatic Studies
    • 4
    • PDF
    Measurements, Models, and Hypotheses in the Atmospheric Sciences
    • 81
    • PDF
    Equifinality and Uncertainty in Geomorphological Modelling
    • 70
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 36 REFERENCES