• Corpus ID: 55353055

Value at risk (VaR) backtesting 'Evidence from a South African market portfolio'

  title={Value at risk (VaR) backtesting 'Evidence from a South African market portfolio'},
  author={Gerald Z. Katsenga},
Value at Risk (VaR) has emerged as one of the most prominent risk measurement techniques in finance. It is a measure that quantifies the worst expected loss over a given confidence level and target horizon, under normal market conditions. In this thesis, the concept of VaR as an invaluable tool for financial risk management is explained, and a theoretical but detailed description of some of the methods of VaR computation are presented, with a key emphasis on the assumptions and shortcomings of… 

Analysis of stock exchange risk and currency in South African Financial Markets using stable parameter estimation

In the preceding decade, the South African economy has experienced challenges due to global disruptive events, hence, the implementation of risk mitigation strategies becomes a priority in volatile

Estimating the value-at-risk of JSE indices and South African exchange rate with Generalized Pareto and stable distributions

South Africa’s economy has faced many downturns in the previous decade, and to curb the spread of the novel SARS-CoV-2, the lockdown brought South African financial markets to an abrupt halt.

Multivariate elliptically contoured stable distributions with applications to BRICS financial data.

Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) are regarded as the five major emerging economies where all members are a part of a select group of developing industrialized countries. In the

The Impacts of The Week Effect on The JII Returns and Risks

This study aims to examine the impacts of the day of the week effect on stock returns and measurements of risks in companies listed on the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) for the June 2018-May 2019



Backtesting Value-at-Risk Models

Value-at-Risk has become one of the most popular risk measurement techniques in finance. However, VaR models are useful only if they predict future risks accurately. In order to evaluate the quality

Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A Duration-Based Approach

Financial risk model evaluation or backtesting is a key part of the internal model's approach to market risk management as laid out by the Basle Commitee on Banking Supervision (1996). However,

Comparing Different Methods for Estimating Value-at-Risk (VaR) for Actual Non-Linear Portfolios: Empirical Evidence

The main conclusion is that, when estimating VaR for non-linear actual portfolios, in a context of supervision of bank solvency, the precision of the Monte Carlo simulation method is to be preferred to the speed that can be obtained with the variance-covariance matrix analytic method.

Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk

Since its original publication, Value at Risk has become the industry standard in risk management. Now in its Third Edition, this international bestseller addresses the fundamental changes in the

Value-at-Risk Prediction: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies

Given the growing need for managing financial risk, risk prediction plays an increasing role in banking and finance. In this study we compare the out-of-sample performance of existing methods and

Evaluating Predictive Performance of Value-at-Risk Models in Emerging Markets: A Reality Check

We investigate the predictive performance of various classes of value-at-risk (VaR) models in several dimensions-unfiltered versus filtered VaR models, parametric versus nonparametric distributions,

A New Approach to Comparing VaR Estimation Methods

An innovative method of extracting daily values for bank revenues from their annual reports is used to explore which VaR methods empirically work best and suggests that, in estimating VaR for banks, parametric methods work best.

The Level and Quality of Value-at-Risk Disclosure by Commercial Banks

In this paper we study both the level of Value-at-Risk (VaR) disclosure and the accuracy of the disclosed VaR figures for a sample of US and international commercial banks. To measure the level of

Evaluating Value at Risk Methodologies: Accuracy versus Computational Time

Recent research has shown that different methods of computing Value at Risk (VAR) generate widely varying results, suggesting the choice of VAR method is very important. This article examines six VAR

Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models

It does not appear possible for a bank or its supervisor to reliably verify the accuracy of an institution's internal model loss exposure estimates using standard statistical techniques, and the results have implications both for banks that wish to assess the accuracies of their internal risk measurement models as well as for supervisors who must verify the accurate estimate.