Validity of the School-age Assessment of Attachment for moderate-risk, rural early adolescents.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION This study provides evidence of validity of the School-age Assessment of Attachment (SAA) through longitudinal comparison with the Preschool Assessment of Attachment (PAA) and with concurrent attachment assessments and measures of risk and parenting. Determining which assessment had the greatest validity with this moderate-risk sample would be of benefit to those working with troubled young people and their families. HYPOTHESES Children's SAA classifications were expected to correspond to their PAA, a behavioral attachment assessment, parenting, and risk. An attachment questionnaire was predicted to not accurately indicate children's risk status. DESIGN The design was an 8-year longitudinal follow-up of rural Appalachian American preschoolers. METHOD The participants were 21 children and their caregivers. The PAA was completed at age 4. The SAA, a self-report questionnaire, and a parent-child conflict resolution task were completed at age 12. Parents completed assessments of depression, trauma, stress, and perceptions of helplessness. RESULTS The PAA was related to the SAA and the dyadic behavioral task. The SAA was consistently associated with measures of parenting and family risk. The attachment questionnaire performed poorly for children with higher risk status, suggesting more (not less) sensitive and responsive parenting.

DOI: 10.1177/1359104515591227

Cite this paper

@article{Kidwell2015ValidityOT, title={Validity of the School-age Assessment of Attachment for moderate-risk, rural early adolescents.}, author={Shari L Kidwell and Kayla M Sizemore and Jin Qu and Katelyn M Fugate and Michelle S Deaton and Morgan D Blevins}, journal={Clinical child psychology and psychiatry}, year={2015}, volume={20 3}, pages={366-80} }