Validity of four self-reported colorectal cancer screening modalities in a general population: differences over time and by intervention assignment.

@article{Jones2008ValidityOF,
  title={Validity of four self-reported colorectal cancer screening modalities in a general population: differences over time and by intervention assignment.},
  author={Resa M. Jones and Steven J Mongin and Deann Lazovich and Timothy Robert Church and Mark W. Yeazel},
  journal={Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology},
  year={2008},
  volume={17 4},
  pages={777-84}
}
Little is known about the validity of self-reported colorectal cancer screening. To date, few published studies have validated all four screening modalities per recommended guidelines or included a general population-based sample, and none has assessed validity over time and by intervention condition. To estimate the validity of self-reported screening, a random sample of 200 adults, ages > or =50 years, was selected from those completing annual surveys on screening behavior as part of an… CONTINUE READING
23 Citations
28 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 23 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 28 references

Adjustment for non-response in the Minnesota nurses study. University of Minnesota Health Studies Section technical report

  • S. Mongin
  • [last accessed 2007 Dec 22]. Available from: http…
  • 2007
1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…