Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance

@inproceedings{Hunter1984ValidityAU,
  title={Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance},
  author={John Edward Hunter and Ronda F. Hunter},
  year={1984}
}
Meta-analysis of the cumulative research on various predictors of job performance shows that for entry-level jobs there is no predictor with validity equal to that of ability, which has a mean validity of .53. For selection on the basis of current job performance, the work sample test, with mean validity of .54, is slightly better. For federal entry-level jobs, substitution of an alternative predictor would cost from $3.12 billion (job tryout) to $15.89 billion per year (age). Hiring on ability… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 731 CITATIONS

A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European community.

  • The Journal of applied psychology
  • 2003
VIEW 9 EXCERPTS
CITES RESULTS, METHODS & BACKGROUND
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

1984
2019

CITATION STATISTICS

  • 80 Highly Influenced Citations

  • Averaged 28 Citations per year from 2017 through 2019

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 86 REFERENCES

An analysis of validity, differential validity, test fairness, and utility for the Philadelphia Police Officers Selection Examination prepared by the Educational Testing Service

J. E. Hunter
  • (Report to the Philadelphia Federal District Court, Alvarez v. City of Philadelphia)
  • 1979
VIEW 6 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

The validity of assessment centers: A literature review

B. Cohen, J. L. Moses, W. C. Byham
  • 1974
VIEW 5 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

A structure of worker functions

S. A. Fine
  • Personnel and Guidance Journal, 34, 66-73.
  • 1955
VIEW 6 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

When testing pays off.

VIEW 3 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL