Validation of digital pathology imaging for primary histopathological diagnosis.

  title={Validation of digital pathology imaging for primary histopathological diagnosis.},
  author={David R. J. Snead and Yee-Wah Tsang and Aisha Meskiri and Peter K Kimani and R. J. Crossman and Nasir M. Rajpoot and Elaine Blessing and Klaus Hammes Yinghong Chen and Kishore Gopalakrishnan and Paul Matthews and Navid Momtahan and Sarah Read-Jones and Shatrughan Sah and E J V Simmons and Bidisa Sinha and Sari Suortamo and Yen Teng Yeo and Hesham El Daly and Ian A Cree},
  volume={68 7},
AIMS Digital pathology (DP) offers advantages over glass slide microscopy (GS), but data demonstrating a statistically valid equivalent (i.e. non-inferior) performance of DP against GS are required to permit its use in diagnosis. The aim of this study is to provide evidence of non-inferiority. METHODS AND RESULTS Seventeen pathologists re-reported 3017 cases by DP. Of these, 1009 were re-reported by the same pathologist, and 2008 by a different pathologist. Re-examination of 10 138 scanned… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 13 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS


Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 23 extracted citations


Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 25 references

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…