Validation of Bohr dead space measured by volumetric capnography


Bohr’s dead space (VDBohr) is commonly calculated using end-tidal CO2 instead of the true alveolar partial pressure of CO2 (PACO2). The aim of this work was to validate VDBohr using PACO2 derived from volumetric capnography (VC) against VDBohr with PACO2 values obtained from the standard alveolar air formula. Expired gases of seven lung-lavaged pigs were analyzed at different lung conditions using main-stream VC and multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET). PACO2 was determined by VC as the midpoint of the slope of phase III of the capnogram, while mean expired partial pressure of CO2 (PeCO2) was calculated as the mean expired fraction of CO2 times the barometric minus the water vapor pressure. MIGET estimated expired CO2 output (VCO2) and PeCO2 by its V/Q algorithms. Then, PACO2 was obtained applying the alveolar air formula (PACO2 = VCO2/alveolar ventilation). We found close linear correlations between the two methods for calculating both PACO2 (r = 0.99) and VDBohr (r = 0.96), respectively (both p < 0.0001). Mean PACO2 from VC was very similar to the one obtained by MIGET with a mean bias of −0.10 mmHg and limits of agreement between −2.18 and 1.98 mmHg. Mean VDBohr from VC was close to the value obtained by MIGET with a mean bias of 0.010 ml and limits of agreement between −0.044 and 0.064 ml. VDBohr can be calculated with accuracy using volumetric capnography.

DOI: 10.1007/s00134-011-2164-x

2 Figures and Tables

Citations per Year

284 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 284 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Tusman2011ValidationOB, title={Validation of Bohr dead space measured by volumetric capnography}, author={Gerardo Tusman and Fernando Su{\'a}rez Sipmann and Jo{\~a}o Batista Borges and G{\"{o}ran Hedenstierna and Stephan Bohm}, journal={Intensive Care Medicine}, year={2011}, volume={37}, pages={1397-1398} }