Valence Asymmetries in Attitude Ambivalence

@article{Snyder2017ValenceAI,
  title={Valence Asymmetries in Attitude Ambivalence},
  author={Aaron Snyder and Zakary L. Tormala},
  journal={Journal of Personality and Social Psychology},
  year={2017},
  volume={112},
  pages={555–576}
}
Existing models of ambivalence suggest that as the number of conflicting reactions (e.g., attitude components) increases, so too does the experience of ambivalence. Interestingly, though, these models overwhelmingly assume that this relationship is independent of valence. Across 3 studies we observe that this effect is in fact heavily influenced by 2 established valence asymmetries: positivity offset (baseline positive reactions even in the absence of positive information) and negativity bias… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

The role of dialecticism in objective and subjective attitudinal ambivalence.
TLDR
Across studies, greater dialectical thinking was associated with holding both positive and negative evaluations of the same topic and weaker correlations between objective ambivalence and subjective reports of being conflicted (subjective ambivalences).
Social evaluations under conflict: negative judgments of conflicting information are easier than positive judgments
TLDR
This finding supports the idea that additional regulation and a more active selection process are necessary to override an initial negative response to evaluatively conflicting information, and suggests that negative judgments are easier and may be considered the ‘default’ action when experiencing evaluative conflict.
Going beyond a positive–negative dichotomy in judgment and decision‐making research: Insights for framing, counterfactual thinking, and ambivalence
Funding information Center for Social and Economic Behavior (CSEB), Grant/Award Number: Rd09-2019-SGSparks Abstract Many areas of judgment and decision-making research have historically relied on a
Mix is different from nix: Mouse tracking differentiates ambivalence from neutrality
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and Social Cognition
Attitudes and Social Cognition © 2021 American Psychological Association {THIS IS NOT THE OFFICIAL PUBLISHED DOCUMENT} ISSN: 0022-3514 https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000248 Dampening Affect Via
It’s Not Just Black or White: Effects of Ambivalence on Residents’ Support for a Mega-Event
Residents can simultaneously possess positive and negative evaluations of mega-events hosted in their communities. The coexistence of positive and negative evaluations is attitudinal ambivalence. The
Ambivalence and Self-Reported Adherence to Recommendations to Reduce the Spread of COVID-19
Abstract. Governments worldwide still, to some extent, rely on behavioral recommendations to reduce the spread of COVID-19. We examine the role of ambivalence toward both the specific recommendations
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 53 REFERENCES
Effects of Attitudinal Ambivalence on Information Processing and Attitude-Intention Consistency☆
Abstract We hypothesize that, when encountering a new or unfamiliar attitude object that has both positiveandnegative attributes, such evaluatively inconsistent information leads toattitudinal
The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence.
TLDR
This research examined the relationship between the measured and manipulated positive and negative bases of attitudes and the psychological experience of attitudinal ambivalence and the gradual threshold model of ambivalences was advanced.
Whence Univalent Ambivalence? From the Anticipation of Conflicting Reactions
The subjective experience of ambivalence results from possessing both positive and negative reactions. Why do individuals sometimes experience ambivalence when they possess only positive or only
Feeling Torn When Everything Seems Right
TLDR
Experiments 3a and 3b revealed that aversive dissonant feelings play a role in the effects of evaluative incongruence, but not semantic incongrience, on felt ambivalence.
Ambivalence and Response Amplification: A Motivational Perspective
This research investigated whether ambivalence-induced response amplification occurs because of a motivation to reduce ambivalence. In Study 1, participants’ ambivalence toward Native people was
Variations on a human universal: Individual differences in positivity offset and negativity bias
The positivity offset refers to a tendency for the positive motivational system to respond more than the negative motivation system at low levels of evaluative input. The negativity bias refers to a
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
We hypothesize that there is a general bias, based on both innatepredispositions and experience, in animals and humans, to give greater weight to negative entities (e.g., events, objects, personal
Exploring the Valence‐Framing Effect: Negative Framing Enhances Attitude Strength
In his now-classic research on inoculation theory, McGuire (1964) demonstrated that exposing people to an initial weak counterattitudinal message could lead to enhanced resistance to a subsequent
Feeling Conflicted and Seeking Information
TLDR
It is believed that conflicted attitudes might also motivate attitude-congruent selective exposure because proattitudinal information should be effective in reducing ambivalence.
...
...