Utility of femorofemoral bypass. Comparison of results with indications for operation.

Abstract

Sixty-eight patients underwent femorofemoral bypass (FFB) at the University of Louisville Affiliated Hospitals over a 9-year period from 1980 to 1989. There were patients with acute ischemia requiring emergency operation, those with chronic ischemia following failed aortic reconstruction, good-risk patients with chronic ischemia who had FFB as the procedure of choice, and poor-risk patients who were unsuitable for other procedures. Patients operated on for acute ischemia had a significant number of infectious complications, with five of eight graft failures in this group due to infection. Primary patency rates were similar in all groups, with a 5-year primary patency of 42 per cent. Overall operative mortality was 4.4 per cent. Satisfactory limb salvage rates (75%) suggest that FFB is an acceptable option for providing inflow in patients with acute ischemia or for patients with a failed previous vascular prosthesis. FFB provides adequate inflow in poor-risk patients not suitable for aortic reconstruction, but patency rates do not warrant its use as a procedure of choice in good-risk patients.

Cite this paper

@article{Self1991UtilityOF, title={Utility of femorofemoral bypass. Comparison of results with indications for operation.}, author={Stuart Self and J. D. Richardson and Tineke Klamer and Hermann W Kaebnick and Giselle Lambert and Richard A S Mitchell}, journal={The American surgeon}, year={1991}, volume={57 9}, pages={602-6} }