Uterine-preserving POP surgery

@article{Gutman2013UterinepreservingPS,
  title={Uterine-preserving POP surgery},
  author={Robert Gutman and Christopher M. Maher},
  journal={International Urogynecology Journal},
  year={2013},
  volume={24},
  pages={1803-1813}
}
To review the safety and efficacy of uterine preservation surgery. Every four years and as part of the Fifth International Collaboration on Incontinence we reviewed the English-language scientific literature after searching PubMed, Medline, Cochrane library and Cochrane database of systematic reviews, published up to January 2012. Publications were classified as level 1 evidence (randomised controlled trials [RCT] or systematic reviews), level 2 (poor quality RCT, prospective cohort studies… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 28 extracted citations

Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse?

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology • 2016
View 3 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction

International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology • 2016
View 4 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Clinical outcomes in women undergoing laparoscopic hysteropexy: A systematic review.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology • 2017
View 2 Excerpts

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 67 references

Risk factors for failure of transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension in the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.

Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi • 2005
View 3 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Pillai-Allen A (2003) Risk of mesh erosion with sacral colpopexy and concurrent hysterectomy

S Brizzolara
Obstet Gynecol • 2003
View 2 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

experience of 402 patients

AA Stepanian, JR Miklos, RD Moore, extrusion Mattox TF Risk of mesh, hysterectomy other mesh-related complications after laparoscopi vaginal
J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(2):188–196 Int Urogynecol J • 2013
View 1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…