Using visualizations to review a group's interaction dynamics

@article{DiMicco2006UsingVT,
  title={Using visualizations to review a group's interaction dynamics},
  author={Joan Morris DiMicco and Katherine J. Hollenbach and Walter Bender},
  journal={CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems},
  year={2006}
}
We present a visualization system for reviewing the turn-taking patterns in a face-to-face meeting. Without the need to directly observe a group, a user can use the system to gain insight into the interaction dynamics of a meeting. We evaluated the visualizations by asking outside observers to make qualitative judgments about the individuals represented visually, and then compared their assessments to our own, made from direct observation of the meetings. 
Seeing More: Visualizing Audio Cues
TLDR
This paper presents user study evaluation of the Conversation Clock as utilized by familiar groups and demonstrates how individuals use the salient cues to evaluate their own interaction.
Bubble Visualization Overlay in Online Communication for Increased Speed Awareness and Better Turn Taking
TLDR
The results suggest that the presence of the speech visualization helps NES to understand their speech speed, and subsequently, it helps EFLS to feel comfortable speaking during the online group discussion.
Visualization of Multi-sensory Meeting Information to Support Awareness
TLDR
Initial findings suggest that the proposed approach can facilitate awareness without the need for detailed meeting transcriptions and associated audio recordings, however the quality of speech recognition results and their effective visualization remain critical factors for increased adoption.
Meeting mediator: enhancing group collaboration with sociometric feedback
TLDR
The Meeting Mediator is presented, a real-time, personal, and portable system providing feedback to enhance group collaboration that had a significant effect on overlapping speaking time and interactivity level without distracting the subjects.
The Impact of Increased Awareness While Face-to-Face
TLDR
Second Messenger, a system of dynamic awareness displays that reveal speaker participation patterns in a face-to-face discussion, is presented, suggesting that awareness applications bring about systematic changes in group communication styles.
Online and off-line visualization of meeting information and meeting support
TLDR
This work surveys the research in this area, and looks at issues that deal with turn-taking and gaze behavior of meeting participants, influence and talkativeness, and virtual embodied representations of meeting Participants.
Visualizing the Decision-Making Process in a Face-to-Face Meeting
TLDR
It is postulate that by visualizing the group dynamics during a face-to-face meeting, administrators might be able to get a better handle on the strengths and weaknesses of the group's consultation process and improve the overall quality of meetings.
“ That ’ s not just me ” : Encouraging Minority Participation Using Deceptive Group Decision Visualization
Group decision making often leads to putting pressure on minority group members, who might have useful information but find it hard to share them under group pressure. Traditional solutions such as
No forests without trees: particulars and patterns in visualizing personal communication
TLDR
PieTime, a visualization that focuses on presenting aggregated behavioral data at timescales from hours to months, builds on work in conversation visualization and lifelogging by focusing on rhythms rather than details, supporting reflection across media, and using phone logs to complement CMC media.
...
1
2
3
4
...

References

SHOWING 1-8 OF 8 REFERENCES
Influencing group participation with a shared display
TLDR
A behavioral study examines how a shared display of individual speaker-participation rates can impact the behavior of the group during a collaboration task and suggests that this approach of providing peripheral displays of social information is promising for improving certain types of group interactions.
Collaborative technology and group process feedback: their impact on interactive sequences in meetings
TLDR
If group process feedback is given to people participating in a computer-supported collaborative technology meeting, the number of socio-emotional interactive sequences increases significantly above the expected level determined by log-linear analysis, in contrast to when using collaborative computer technology alone (no feedback).
Visualizing the pulse of a classroom
TLDR
A multiparty videoconferencing system that automatically determines whether students are speaking, making gestures, or moving in their seats to facilitate the tracking of communicative actions in a remote classroom is built.
Chat circles
TLDR
Chat Circles is presented, an abstract graphical interface for synchronous conversa-tion that makes presence and activity made manifest by changes in color and form, proximity-based filtering intuitively breaks large groups intoconversational clusters, and the archives of a conversation are made visible through an integrated history interface.
A unified structure-based framework for indexing and gisting of meetings
TLDR
This work uses speaker identification, prosody analysis and word spotting as preprocessing steps to find the structure of the meeting, modeled using a stochastic approach based on the hidden Markov model.
Groups That Work (and Those That Don't)Groups That Work (and Those That Don't) by Hackman Richard. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991, 512 pp.
This article presents a review of the book “Groups That Work (And Those That Don't),” by Richard Hackman.
Groups that work (and those that Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork, edited by J. Richard Hackman. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass 1990, 512 pp. Price: $39.95 cloth
Introduction: Work Teams in Organizations: An Orienting Frameword. TOP MANAGEMENT GROUPS: SETTING ORGANIZATIONAL DIRECTIONS. Fairfield Coordinating Group (R. Eisenstat). Corporate Restructuring Team
Interaction process analysis.