Using a cognitive network model of moral and social beliefs to explain belief change

@article{Dalege2021UsingAC,
  title={Using a cognitive network model of moral and social beliefs to explain belief change},
  author={Jonas Dalege and Tamara van der Does},
  journal={Science Advances},
  year={2021},
  volume={8}
}
Skepticism toward childhood vaccines and genetically modified food has grown despite scientific evidence of their safety. Beliefs about scientific issues are difficult to change because they are entrenched within many interrelated moral concerns and beliefs about what others think. We propose a cognitive network model that estimates network ties between all interrelated beliefs to calculate the overall dissonance and interdependence. Using a probabilistic nationally representative longitudinal… 

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 52 REFERENCES

Moral and Social Foundations of Beliefs about Scientific Issues: Predicting and Understanding Belief Change

Most efforts to increase public acceptance of scientific facts have focused on providing transparent factual information. While this is essential for enabling people to make informed decisions,

Collective Dynamics of Belief Evolution under Cognitive Coherence and Social Conformity

This work proposes a unifying framework that connects cognitive and social forces together in order to study the dynamics of societal belief evolution, and argues that the inclusion of cognitive factors into a social model could provide a more complete picture of collective human dynamics.

Toward a formalized account of attitudes: The Causal Attitude Network (CAN) model.

The Causal Attitude Network (CAN) model is introduced, which conceptualizes attitudes as networks consisting of evaluative reactions and interactions between these reactions, and is argued that the CAN model provides a realistic formalized measurement model of attitudes and therefore fills a crucial gap in the attitude literature.

Integrating social and cognitive aspects of belief dynamics: towards a unifying framework

This work outlines a unifying quantitative framework that enables theoretical and empirical comparisons of different belief dynamic models and shows how this framework can be used to integrate extant knowledge and develop a more comprehensive understanding of belief dynamics.

A Network Perspective on Attitude Strength: Testing the Connectivity Hypothesis

This work shows that political interest predicts connectivity of attitude networks toward presidential candidates and shows that connectivity is strongly related to two defining features of strong attitudes—stability of the attitude and the attitude's impact on behavior.

Statistical physics models of belief dynamics: Theory and empirical tests

A Sampling Model of Social Judgment

A new process model of social judgment is proposed, the social sampling model (SSM), which provides a parsimonious quantitative account of different types of social judgments, and explains some previously unaccounted-for patterns of self-enhancement and self-depreciation.

How Disgust Influences Health Purity Attitudes

Abstract Food and health regulations are increasingly being pushed onto the political agenda, with rising concerns about genetically modified foods, obesity rates, and vaccination. Public beliefs and

Cultural cognition of scientific consensus

Why do members of the public disagree – sharply and persistently – about facts on which expert scientists largely agree? We designed a study to test a distinctive explanation: the cultural cognition

Not All Skepticism Is Equal: Exploring the Ideological Antecedents of Science Acceptance and Rejection

Overall, science understanding is associated with vaccine and GM food acceptance, but not climate change acceptance, and religious conservatives consistently display a low faith in science and an unwillingness to support science.
...