Corpus ID: 17075250

Using Motor Dynamics to Explore Real-time Competition in Cross-situational Word Learning: Evidence From Two Novel Paradigms

@article{Bunce2016UsingMD,
  title={Using Motor Dynamics to Explore Real-time Competition in Cross-situational Word Learning: Evidence From Two Novel Paradigms},
  author={John P. Bunce and Drew H. Abney and Chelsea L. Gordon and Michael J. Spivey and Rose M. Scott},
  journal={Cognitive Science},
  year={2016}
}
Children and adults can use cross-situational information to identify words’ referents. What do learners retain about the potential referents that occur with a word: do they encode multiple referents or a single guess? We tested this question using novel mouse tracking and finger tracking paradigms. Adults were exposed to novel words in a series of ambiguous training trials and then tested on the words’ referents. In some test trials, participants saw the target and three referents that had… Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 26 REFERENCES
Finding meaning in a noisy world: exploring the effects of referential ambiguity and competition on 2·5-year-olds’ cross-situational word learning*
TLDR
It is suggested that although 2·5-year-olds’ cross-situational learning scales up to more ambiguous scenes, it is disrupted by high-probability competitor referents. Expand
Propose but verify: Fast mapping meets cross-situational word learning
TLDR
It is argued that successful learning in this setting is instead the product of a one-trial procedure in which a single hypothesized word-referent pairing is retained across learning instances, abandoned only if the subsequent instance fails to confirm the pairing. Expand
2.5-Year-olds use cross-situational consistency to learn verbs under referential uncertainty
TLDR
The 2.5-year-olds used cross-situational consistency in verb learning, but also showed significant limits on their ability to do so as the sentences and scenes became slightly more complex, a test of the role of statistical information in word learning. Expand
Cross-Situational Learning: An Experimental Study of Word-Learning Mechanisms
TLDR
Experimental evidence showing that humans learn words effectively using cross-situational learning, even at high levels of referential uncertainty is presented, and it is suggested that these two ways of exploiting cross-Situational information reside on a continuum of learning strategies, underpinned by a single simple associative learning mechanism. Expand
Rapid Word Learning Under Uncertainty via Cross-Situational Statistics
TLDR
A cross-situational learning strategy based on computing distributional statistics across words, across referents, and, most important, across the co-occurrences of words and refereNTs at multiple moments to rapidly learn word-referent pairs even in highly ambiguous learning contexts. Expand
How words can and cannot be learned by observation
TLDR
These findings challenge current models of cross-situational learning which assert that multiple meaning hypotheses are stored and cross-tabulated via statistical procedures and appear to use a one-trial “fast-mapping” procedure, even under conditions of referential uncertainty. Expand
Cross-situational word learning in the right situations.
TLDR
The findings demonstrate that realistic contexts help learners retrieve or discard potential referents for a word, because such contexts can be memorized and associated with a to-be-learned word. Expand
Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics
TLDR
It is shown that 12- and 14-month-old infants can resolve the uncertainty problem in another way, not by unambiguously deciding the referent in a single word-scene pairing, but by rapidly evaluating the statistical evidence across many individually ambiguous words and scenes. Expand
The role of partial knowledge in statistical word learning
TLDR
Three experiments are presented that test and verify claims that partial knowledge of some words speed the acquisition of others and construct and compare computational models embodying each of these hypotheses and show that the latter provides a better explanation of the empirical data. Expand
When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth
Abstract We ask how children solve the mapping problem for verb acquisition: how they pair concepts with their phonological realizations in their language. There is evidence that nouns but not verbsExpand
...
1
2
3
...