Using Game Description Language for mediated dispute resolution

  title={Using Game Description Language for mediated dispute resolution},
  author={Dave de Jonge and Tomas Trescak and Carles Sierra and Simeon J. Simoff and Ram{\'o}n L{\'o}pez de M{\'a}ntaras},
  journal={AI \& SOCIETY},
Mediation is a process in which two parties agree to resolve their dispute by negotiating over alternative solutions presented by a mediator. In order to construct such solutions, the mediator brings more information and knowledge, and, if possible, resources to the negotiation table. In order to do so, the mediator faces the challenge of determining which information is relevant to the current problem, given a vast database of knowledge. The contribution of this paper is the automated… 
GDL as a unifying domain description language for declarative automated negotiation
GDL is a truly unifying language that can also be used to define more general and more complex negotiation domains and it is formally proved that the set of possible agreements of any negotiation domain from Genius can be modeled as a set of strategies over a deterministic extensive-form game.
Enabling Game-Theoretical Analysis of Social Rules
This work introduces the Action Situation Language (ASL), inspired by Elinor Ostrom’s Institutional Analysis and Development framework, to bridge the gap between games and rules.
A Computational Model of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
This work presents the first attempt to turn the IAD framework into a computational model to allow communities of agents to formally perform what-if analysis on a given rule configuration, and defines the Action Situation Language -- or ASL -- whose syntax is tailored to the components of the I AD framework and that is used to write descriptions of social interactions.


Using GDL to Represent Domain Knowledge for Automated Negotiations
It is argued that a more realistic model of negotiations would be one in which the negotiator has certain knowledge about the domain and must reason with this knowledge in order to determine the value of a deal, which is time-consuming.
AutoMed: an automated mediator for multi-issue bilateral negotiations
The results show that negotiations mediated by AutoMed are concluded significantly faster than non-mediated ones and without any of the negotiators opting out and the subjects in the mediated negotiations are more satisfied with the resolutions than the Subjects in the non- mediated negotiations.
Problem Restructuring in Negotiation
To achieve movement towards a negotiated settlement, it is often necessary to restructure the problem under negotiation. Problem restructuring can lead to changed perception of the issues by the
A formal analysis of interest-based negotiation
A new formal model for reasoning about interest-based negotiation protocols is proposed and the usefulness of this framework is demonstrated by defining and analysing two different IBN protocols and characterising conditions that guarantee their advantage over the more classic proposal-based approaches to negotiation.
CBR with Commonsense Reasoning and Structure Mapping: An Application to Mediation
This work implements a case based reasoning approach to mediation integrating analogical and commonsense reasoning components that allow an artificial mediation agent to satisfy requirements expected from a human mediator.
Bargaining with information
  • J. Debenham
  • Computer Science
    Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004.
  • 2004
A negotiating agent engages in multi-issue bilateral negotiation in a dynamic information-rich environment and constructs two probability distributions over the set of all deals: first the probability that its opponent will accept a deal, and second that a deal will prove to be acceptable to it in time.
Curious Negotiator
The curious negotiator is a multiagent system with three types of agents that enable the curious negotiator to discover and exploit negotiation opportunities.
The MEDIATOR: Analysis of an Early Case-Based Problem Solver
There remain many lessons that can be learned about case-based reasoning by analyzing the MEDIATOR's behavior, and the reasons why it behaves the way it does are analyzed.
Interest-based Preference Reasoning
It is argued that the criteria by which outcomes are evaluated should be the satisfaction of a person’s underlying interests: the more an outcome satisfies his interests, the more preferred it is.
Negotiating Intelligently
This work proposes that utility functions, or preference orderings, are often not known with certainty; further, the uncertainty that underpins them is typically in a state of flux, and describes an agent architecture, with an attendant theory, that is based on that model.