Using GRADE for evaluating the quality of evidence in hyperbaric oxygen therapy clarifies evidence limitations.

@article{Murad2014UsingGF,
  title={Using GRADE for evaluating the quality of evidence in hyperbaric oxygen therapy clarifies evidence limitations.},
  author={Mohammad Hassan Murad and O. Altayar and M. Bennett and Justin C. Wei and Paul L. Claus and N. Asi and Larry J. Prokop and V. Montori and Gordon H. Guyatt},
  journal={Journal of clinical epidemiology},
  year={2014},
  volume={67 1},
  pages={
          65-72
        }
}
  • Mohammad Hassan Murad, O. Altayar, +6 authors Gordon H. Guyatt
  • Published 2014
  • Medicine
  • Journal of clinical epidemiology
  • OBJECTIVES The current evidence rating for hyperbaric oxygen therapy indications uses the American Heart Association system, which mainly depends on the study design. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We systematically reviewed the literature and applied the Grading of Evidence, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to the main patient-important outcomes in each indication. RESULTS We included 17 systematic reviews that synthesized 44 randomized trials and 131 observational studies… CONTINUE READING
    A clinical practice guideline for the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.
    • 47
    • PDF
    The Quality of the Evidence According to GRADE Is Predominantly Low or Very Low in Oral Health Systematic Reviews
    • 15
    • Highly Influenced
    New evidence pyramid
    • 234
    • PDF
    Clinical Practice Guidelines
    • 40

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 39 REFERENCES
    GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.
    • 2,244
    • PDF
    Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Wound Healing and Limb Salvage: A Systematic Review
    • 112
    • PDF
    Hyperbaric oxygen for treating wounds: a systematic review of the literature.
    • 160
    • PDF
    Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds.
    • 448
    • PDF