User Involvement in the Design and Development of Patient Decision Aids and Other Personal Health Tools: A Systematic Review

@article{Vaisson2021UserII,
  title={User Involvement in the Design and Development of Patient Decision Aids and Other Personal Health Tools: A Systematic Review},
  author={Gratianne Vaisson and Thierry Provencher and Mich{\`e}le Dugas and Marie-{\`E}ve Trottier and Selma Chipenda Dansokho and Heather L. Colquhoun and Angela Fagerlin and Anik M. C. Giguere and Hina Hakim and Lynne Haslett and Aubri S. Hoffman and Noah Michael Ivers and Anne-Sophie Julien and France L{\'e}gar{\'e} and Jean-S{\'e}bastien Renaud and Dawn Stacey and Robert J. Volk and Holly O. Witteman},
  journal={Medical Decision Making},
  year={2021},
  volume={41},
  pages={261 - 274}
}
Background When designing and developing patient decision aids, guidelines recommend involving patients and stakeholders. There are myriad ways to do this. We aimed to describe how such involvement occurs by synthesizing reports of patient decision aid design and development within a user-centered design framework and to provide context by synthesizing reports of user-centered design applied to other personal health tools. Methods We included articles describing at least one development step of… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration
TLDR
Decision aid developers have embraced principles of user-centered design in the development of patient decision aids while also underreporting aspects of user involvement in publications about their tools.
An 11-Item Measure of User- and Human-Centered Design for Personal Health Tools (UCD-11): Development and Validation
TLDR
The User-Centered Design 11-item measure (UCD-11) may be used to quantitatively document the user/human-centeredness of design and development processes of patient-centered tools by building an evidence base about such processes.
A Veteran-Centric Web-Based Decision Aid for Lung Cancer Screening: Usability Analysis
TLDR
The findings support the development and use of this eHealth technology in the primary care clinical setting as a way to engage veterans, inform them about a new cancer control screening test, and prepare them to participate in an SDM discussion with their provider.
A scattered landscape: assessment of the evidence base for 71 patient decision aids developed in a hospital setting
TLDR
How PtDAs are developed and how S2C evidence reviews for each PtDA are conducted are described and the quality of the best available evidence identified is appraised to identify challenges associated with identified evidence.
Refining a primary care shared decision-making aid for lifestyle change: a mixed-methods study
TLDR
The SHARE-D decision aid for healthy lifestyle change appears to have good content validity and acceptability and should be examined to examine its effectiveness.
Informed decision making on the uptake of evidence-based smoking cessation assistance: A needs assessment among end users and experts to inform decision aid development
TLDR
The aim of this study was to explore smokers' needs and viewpoints regarding a smoking cessation assistance DA, and to obtain consensus among smoking cessation counsellors and scientific experts about the content and format of such a DA.
Using Mixed Methods With Multiple Stakeholders to Inform Development of a Breast Cancer Screening Decision Aid for Women With Limited Health Literacy
TLDR
While experts and PCPs prioritized providing evidence-based screening options only, emphasized false positives as the primary mammography harm, and downplayed the relevance of delivering mammography process information, patients had a broader scope of harms and viewed process information as fundamental to their decision making.
Development of a New Encounter Decision Aid for Smoking Cessation (Preprint)
TLDR
An electronic encounter decision aid that facilitates physician-patient interaction and shared decision making for smoking cessation in primary care and the overall assessment of the DA by a group of physicians and experts was positive.
Informed Decision Making on the Uptake of Evidence-Based Smoking Cessation Assistance by Individuals Motivated to Quit Smoking
TLDR
The aim of this needs assessment was to obtain consensus among smoking cessation counsellors and scientific experts to develop a self-administered DA to support end users in choosing cessation assistance.
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 44 REFERENCES
Involving members of vulnerable populations in the development of patient decision aids: a mixed methods sequential explanatory study
TLDR
Interviews with developers whose projects had involved members of vulnerable populations suggested that informal needs assessment activities served to center the decision aid around users’ needs, to better avoid stigma, and to ensure that the topic truly matters to the community.
A systematic development process for patient decision aids
TLDR
A model development process is described that includes all the original elements of the original IPDAS criterion, expanded to include consideration of format and distribution plans as well as prototype development.
Delivering patient decision aids on the Internet: definitions, theories, current evidence, and emerging research areas
TLDR
An updated definition for the delivery of patient decision aids on the Internet is provided, a theoretical rationale is outlined, current evidence is described, and emerging areas of research are discussed.
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
TLDR
Tests indicate that decision aids improve knowledge and realistic expectations; enhance active participation in decision making; lower decisional conflict; decrease the proportion of people remaining undecided, and improve agreement between values and choice.
Human Factors Engineering in HI: So What? Who Cares? and What's in It for You?
  • P. Elkin
  • Medicine
    Healthcare informatics research
  • 2012
TLDR
Patient safety and best practice of medicine requires a partnership between patients, clinicians and computer systems that serve to improve the quality and safety of patient care and the methodology of human factors engineering and usability testing in particular were reviewed.
Prime Time for Shared Decision Making
TLDR
Common definitions, trusted certified decision aids, clinician engagement, strategies to enable seamless integration into practice, and a commitment to evaluation and improvement are needed are needed to achieve genuine shared decision making that is embraced by clinicians and patients alike.
Development of a PC-based diabetes simulator in collaboration with teenagers with type 1 diabetes.
TLDR
A PC-based interactive diabetes simulator prototype as a part of future Internet-based support systems for young teenagers and their families may create substantial interest among teenagers and parents, and the prototype seems worthy of further development and studies.
Designing the user interface strategies for effective human-computer interaction
TLDR
The Sixth Edition of Designing the User Interface provides a comprehensive, authoritative, and up-to-date introduction to the dynamic field of human-computer interaction (HCI) and user experience (UX) design.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...