Usefulness of a Human Error Identification Tool for Requirements Inspection: An Experience Report

@inproceedings{Anu2017UsefulnessOA,
  title={Usefulness of a Human Error Identification Tool for Requirements Inspection: An Experience Report},
  author={Vaibhav K. Anu and Gursimran Singh Walia and Gary L. Bradshaw and Wenhua Hu and Jeffrey C. Carver},
  booktitle={REFSQ},
  year={2017}
}
Context and Motivation: Our recent work leverages Cognitive Psychology research on human errors to improve the standard fault-based requirements inspections. Question: The empirical study presented in this paper investigates the effectiveness of a newly developed Human Error Abstraction Assist (HEAA) tool in helping inspectors identify human errors to guide the fault detection during the requirements inspection. Results: The results showed that the HEAA tool, though effective, presented… CONTINUE READING

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.

Issues and Opportunities for Human Error-Based Requirements Inspections: An Exploratory Study

  • 2017 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM)
  • 2017
VIEW 8 EXCERPTS
CITES RESULTS, BACKGROUND & METHODS