Use of the mutual exclusivity assumption by young word learners

@article{Markman2003UseOT,
  title={Use of the mutual exclusivity assumption by young word learners},
  author={Ellen M. Markman and Judith L. Wasow and Mikkel Hansen},
  journal={Cognitive Psychology},
  year={2003},
  volume={47},
  pages={241-275}
}

Tables from this paper

Language Experience Shapes the Development of the Mutual Exclusivity Bias.

It is suggested that children who are raised with more than one language fail to develop an ME strategy in parallel with monolingual infants because development of the bias is a consequence of the monolingUAL child's everyday experiences with words.

Use Of The Logical Argument Disjunctive Syllogism Supports Word-Learning In Children And Adults

The past fifteen years have seen a proliferation of proposed word-learning constraints hypothesized to guide a word-learner to the correct referent of a newly heard word. One such class of

Mutual exclusivity and phonological novelty constrain word learning at 16 months.

Investigating whether infants aged 1 ; 4 could use mutual exclusivity to guide their association of novel labels with novel objects shows that infants can successfully map a novel label onto a novel object, provided that the novel label has no familiar phonological neighbours.

The Role of Novelty in Early Word Learning

Differences in the time course of disambiguation across experiments suggest that novelty processing may be influenced by contextual factors.

Second label learning in bilingual and monolingual infants.

It is argued that theoretical accounts of early word learning must consider the crucial role of linguistic experience, as both bilingual and monolingual infants are systematic in their interpretation of a novel label for a familiar object, but that they show different interpretations of that label.

Learning words: children disregard some pragmatic information that conflicts with mutual exclusivity.

The results suggest that children expect words to be mutually exclusive even when a speaker provides some kinds of pragmatic evidence to the contrary.

The effects of linguistic experience on the flexible use of mutual exclusivity in word learning*

Mutual Exclusivity (ME) is a prominent constraint in language acquisition, which guides children to establish one-to-one mappings between words and referents. But how does unfolding experience of

The development of fast-mapping and novel word retention strategies in monolingual and bilingual infants.

Findings indicate that the development of the ME assumption as a reliable word-learning strategy is shaped by children's individual language exposure and experience with language use.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 76 REFERENCES

The principle of mutual exclusivity in word learning: to honor or not to honor?

It is suggested that even preschool children can make use of knowledge about language and categorization to fine tune the mutual exclusivity assumption in order to use it effectively in word learning.

Constraints on word meaning in early language acquisition

Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words

The mutual exclusivity bias in children's word learning.

Infants' reliance on a social criterion for establishing word-object relations.

By 18-20 months children are inclined to establish a mapping between word and object only when a speaker displays signs of referring to that object.

The Role of Discourse Novelty in Early Word Learning

2 studies of word learning are reported. In Study 1, 24-month-old children and 2 adults played with 3 nameless objects. These objects were placed in a clear box along with a novel nameless object.

Sixteen- and 24-month-olds' use of mutual exclusivity as a default assumption in second-label learning

The significance of the mutual exclusivity assumption for early word learning has been questioned on 2 accounts: (a) Children learn second labels for objects, which violates the assumption, and (b)

Children's use of information in word learning

  • T. Au
  • Psychology, Linguistics
    Journal of Child Language
  • 1990
It is suggested that children can use information in the input very efficiently in learning a term for an as-yet-unnamed category, but not inlearning a term similar in denotation to a word they already know.

Children's avoidance of lexical overlap: a pragmatic account.

The findings suggest that 3-year-olds' avoidance of lexical overlap is not unique to naming and may derive from children's sensitivity to speakers' communicative intentions.

Young children's disambiguation of object name reference.

Correlations between the tendency to acknowledge a new name's unfamiliarity and to treat it like a similar-sounding familiar name suggested that youngsters' phonological matching skills affect their interpretation of new names.
...