Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs

@article{Miklsi1998UseOE,
  title={Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs},
  author={{\'A}. Mikl{\"o}si and R. Polg{\'a}rdi and J{\'o}zsef Top{\'a}l and Vilmos Cs{\'a}nyi},
  journal={Animal Cognition},
  year={1998},
  volume={1},
  pages={113-121}
}
Abstract Since the observations of O. Pfungst the use of human-provided cues by animals has been well-known in the behavioural sciences (“Clever Hans effect”). It has recently been shown that rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) are unable to use the direction of gazing by the experimenter as a cue for finding food, although after some training they learned to respond to pointing by hand. Direction of gaze is used by chimpanzees, however. Dogs (Canis familiaris) are believed to be sensitive to human… 
Dogs do not demonstrate a human-like bias to defer to communicative cues
TLDR
Findings provide clear evidence that dogs do not demonstrate a human-like bias to defer to communicative cues, and dogs may be more likely to critically evaluate information presented via Communicative cues than either physical or non-communicative cues.
Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris)
TLDR
Wolves can reach the level of dogs in their success of following momentary distal pointing in parallel with improving their readiness to form eye-contact with a human experimenter during several months of formal training.
Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human gestures but not nonhuman tokens to find hidden food.
TLDR
The results indicate that dogs are more sensitive to human cues than equivalent nonhuman cues, and that the size of the cue is a critical element in determining dogs' success in following it.
Use of experimenter-given cues by African gray parrots (Psittacus erithacus)
TLDR
The ability of three African gray parrots to use different human cues (pointing and/or gazing) in an object-choice task is tested and sensitivity to joint attention as a prerequisite to understand pointing gestures as it is to the referential use of labels is discussed.
Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus)
TLDR
The results of this experiment suggest that animals’ use of human given communicative signals depends on cognitive ability, the evolutionary consequences of domestication and enculturation by humans within the individual’s lifetime.
Do dogs follow behavioral cues from an unreliable human?
TLDR
The results suggest that not only dogs are highly skilled at understanding human pointing gestures, but also they make inferences about the reliability of a human who presents cues and consequently modify their behavior flexibly depending on the inference.
Do Owners Have a Clever Hans Effect on Dogs? Results of a Pointing Study
TLDR
Overall the pointing gesture seems to have a strong effect on the choice of dogs in an object-choice task, and can lead the dogs to success without help from their owners as well as it can counteract clear directional instructions provided by the owners.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 60 REFERENCES
Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and human infants (Homo sapiens).
In a series of experiments, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and human infants (Homo sapiens) were investigated as to whether they used experimenter-given cues when
Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by capuchin monkeys
Pointing as an act of social communication by monkeys
Do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) attribute knowledge and ignorance to others?
TLDR
None of the macaques provided any evidence that they realized the different states of knowledge possessed by the guesser and knower, consistent with the hypothesis that rhesus macaques are incapable of making inferences about the mental states of others.
Inferences about guessing and knowing by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
TLDR
The visual perspective-taking ability of 4 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) was investigated and results are consistent with the hypothesis that chimpanzees are capable of modeling the visual perspectives of others.
Specificity of gaze-following in young chimpanzees
TLDR
The hypothesis that chimpanzees (like 18-month-old human infants) are capable of determining the specific location in space behind them into which another looks is supported, and extensive commonality in the behavioural manifestations of gaze-following in the two species is suggested.
Factors influencing young chimpanzees' (Pan troglodytes) recognition of attention.
TLDR
The results indicate that young chimpanzees may be selectively attached to other organisms making direct eye contact with them or engaged in postures or movements that indicate attention, even though they may not appreciate the underlying mentalistic significance of these behaviors.
Chimpanzees: Joint Visual Attention
TLDR
Experimental results that chimpanzees display the effect in response to both movement of the head and eyes in concert and eye movement alone are reported, indicating that this capacity may have arisen because of its reproductive payoffs in the context of social competition with conspecifics, predation avoidance, or both.
Gaze following and joint attention in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
TLDR
Analysis of eye movements revealed that both subjects inspected the target (object or position attended by the stimulus monkey) more often than the distractor (nonattended object or position).
...
...