Corpus ID: 34560585

Use and Misuse of the Likert Item Responses and Other Ordinal Measures

  title={Use and Misuse of the Likert Item Responses and Other Ordinal Measures},
  author={P. Bishop and R. Herron},
  journal={International Journal of Exercise Science},
  pages={297 - 302}
  • P. Bishop, R. Herron
  • Published 2015
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • International Journal of Exercise Science
  • Likert, Likert-type, and ordinal-scale responses are very popular psychometric item scoring schemes for attempting to quantify people’s opinions, interests, or perceived efficacy of an intervention and are used extensively in Physical Education and Exercise Science research. However, these numbered measures are generally considered ordinal and violate some statistical assumptions needed to evaluate them as normally distributed, parametric data. This is an issue because parametric statistics are… CONTINUE READING

    Topics from this paper.

    Examining Perceptions and Attitudes
    • G. Ho
    • Medicine, Psychology
    • 2017
    • 19
    New improved gamma: Enhancing the accuracy of Goodman–Kruskal’s gamma using ROC curves
    • 5
    • PDF
    What do first-year engineers and others consider cheating?
    • 3
    • PDF


    Publications referenced by this paper.
    Resolving the 50‐year debate around using and misusing Likert scales
    • 540
    • Highly Influential
    Analyzing Data Measured by Individual Likert-Type Items.
    • 610
    • PDF
    The Midpoint on a Five-Point Likert-Type Scale
    • 92
    Treating ordinal scales as interval scales: an attempt to resolve the controversy.
    • 364
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    A technique for the measurement of attitudes
    • 10,663
    A generalized rank-order method for nonparametric analysis of data from exercise science: a tutorial.
    • 72
    Ten Common Misunderstandings, Misconceptions, Persistent Myths and Urban Legends about Likert Scales and Likert Response Formats and their Antidotes
    • 761
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science
    • 3,300
    • PDF