# Up- and down-quark masses from finite-energy QCD sum rules to five loops

@article{Dominguez2009UpAD,
title={Up- and down-quark masses from finite-energy QCD sum rules to five loops},
author={Cesareo A. Dominguez and Nasrallah F. Nasrallah and Raoul Rontsch and Karl Schilcher},
journal={Physical Review D},
year={2009},
volume={79},
pages={014009}
}
• Published 3 June 2008
• Physics
• Physical Review D
The up- and down-quark masses are determined from an optimized QCD finite-energy sum rule involving the correlator of axial-vector divergences, to five-loop order in perturbative QCD, and including leading nonperturbative QCD and higher order quark-mass corrections. This finite-energy sum rule is designed to reduce considerably the systematic uncertainties arising from the (unmeasured) hadronic resonance sector, which in this framework contributes less than 3--4% to the quark mass. This is…

## Figures from this paper

Up- and down-quark masses from QCD sum rules
• Physics
Journal of High Energy Physics
• 2019
A bstractThe QCD up- and down-quark masses are determined from an optimized QCD Finite Energy Sum Rule (FESR) involving the correlator of axial-vector current divergences. In the QCD sector this
Precision Determination of the Light Quark Masses from QCD Finite Energy Sum Rules
• A. Mes
• Physics
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
• 2019
The light quark masses are determined from a QCD finite energy sum rule, using the pseudoscalar correlator to six-loop order in perturbative QCD, with the leading vacuum condensates and higher order
QUARK MASSES IN QCD: A PROGRESS REPORT
Recent progress on QCD sum rule determinations of the light and heavy quark masses is reported. In the light quark sector a major breakthrough has been made recently in connection with the historical
DETERMINATION OF LIGHT QUARK MASSES IN QCD
The standard procedure to determine (analytically) the values of the quark masses is to relate QCD two-point functions to experimental data in the framework of QCD sum rules. In the case of the light
Quark mass determinations in QCD
Recent progress on QCD sum rule determinations of the light and heavy quark masses is reported. In the light quark sector a major breakthrough has been made recently in connection with the historical
Chiral corrections to the SU(2) × SU(2) Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation
• Physics
• 2010
The next to leading order chiral corrections to the SU(2) ×SU(2) Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner (GMOR) relation are obtained using the pseudoscalar correlator to five-loop order in perturbative QCD, together
QCD determination of the magnetic field dependence of QCD and hadronic parameters
• Physics
Physical Review D
• 2018
A set of four Finite Energy QCD sum rules are used to determine the magnetic field dependence of the sum of the up- and down-quark masses of QCD, $(m_u + m_d)$, the pion decay constant $f_\pi$, the
Analytical determination of the QCD quark masses
The current status of determinations of the QCD running quark masses is reviewed. Emphasis is on recent progress on analytical precision determinations based on finite energy QCD sum rules. A

## References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 11 REFERENCES
"J."
however (for it was the literal soul of the life of the Redeemer, John xv. io), is the peculiar token of fellowship with the Redeemer. That love to God (what is meant here is not God’s love to men)
Z
• Phys., Particles & Fields, C 53, 461 (1992); F. Le Diberder and A. Pich, Phys. Lett. B 286, 147 (1992); M. Jamin, J. High Energy Phys. 0509, 058
• 2005
Phys
• Lett. B 378, 313
• 1996
C
• Aubin et al., Phys. Rev. D 70, 031504 (2004); CP-PACS and JLQCD Collaborations, T. Ishikawa et al., arXiv: hep-lat/0509142, PoS LAT 2005, 057 (2006); QCDSF Collaboration, M. Gockeler at al., arXiv: hep-lat/0509159, PoS LAT 2005, 078 (2006); D. Becirevic et al., Nucl. Phys. B 734, 138 (2006); Q. Maso
• 2006
Phys
• Lett. B 85, 277 (1979); M. Dine,J. Sapirstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 668 (1979) ; W. Celmaster, R. Gonsalves ibid. 44, 560 (1980); S.G. Gorishny, A.L. Kataev, S.A. Larin, Phys. Lett. B 259, 144 (1991) ; L.R. Surguladze, M. Samuel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 560 (1991); T. van Ritbergen, J.A.M. Vermarseren,
• 1997
Phys
• Rev. Lett. 96, 012003 (2006); K.G. Chetyrkin, A. Khodjamirian, Eur. Phys. J. C 46, 721
• 2006
Z
• Phys., Particles & Fields, C26, 269 (1984), C.A. Dominguez, E. de Rafael, Ann. Phys. (New York) 174, 372 (1987). A misprint in the latter has been 5 corrected in: J. Bijnens, J. Prades, E. de Rafael, Phys. Lett. B 348, 226
• 1995
Z
• Phys., Particles & Fields C 66, 633(1995); K.G. Chetyrkin, C.A. Dominguez, D. Pirjol, K. Schilcher, Phys. Rev. D 51, 5090 (1995); K. Chetyrkin, D. Pirjol, K. Schilcher, Phys. Lett. B 404, 337
• 1997
Rev
• Mod. Phys. 78, 1043
• 2006