Unsupervised Performance Evaluation of Image Segmentation


We present in this paper a study of unsupervised evaluation criteria that enable the quantification of the quality of an image segmentation result. These evaluation criteria compute some statistics for each region or class in a segmentation result. Such an evaluation criterion can be useful for different applications: the comparison of segmentation results, the automatic choice of the best fitted parameters of a segmentationmethod for a given image, or the definition of new segmentationmethods by optimization. We first present the state of art of unsupervised evaluation, and then, we compare six unsupervised evaluation criteria. For this comparative study, we use a database composed of 8400 synthetic gray-level images segmented in four different ways. Vinet’s measure (correct classification rate) is used as an objective criterion to compare the behavior of the different criteria. Finally, we present the experimental results on the segmentation evaluation of a few gray-level natural images.

DOI: 10.1155/ASP/2006/96306

Extracted Key Phrases

18 Figures and Tables


Citations per Year

63 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 63 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Chabrier2006UnsupervisedPE, title={Unsupervised Performance Evaluation of Image Segmentation}, author={S{\'e}bastien Chabrier and Bruno Emile and Christophe Rosenberger and H{\'e}l{\`e}ne Laurent}, journal={EURASIP J. Adv. Sig. Proc.}, year={2006}, volume={2006} }