Universality of scholarly impact metrics

  title={Universality of scholarly impact metrics},
  author={Jasleen Kaur and Filippo Radicchi and Filippo Menczer},
  journal={J. Informetrics},

Figures and Tables from this paper

Quality versus quantity in scientific impact
Understanding Relationship between Scholars' Breadth of Research and Scientific Impact
A new metric is defined based on the generalized Stirling metric that considers multiple aspects of breadth of research and the variation of the metric over time illustrates a possible publication pattern for scholars.
Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize
The pros and cons for normalizations using different approaches to normalize citation metrics to account for differences across scientific fields, age, type of document, database coverage, and other factors are discussed.
Visualizing Research Impact through Citation Data
An interactive visualization tool, ImpactVis, is proposed for better exploration of research impact through citation data, which will help answer questions about which research area does a researcher have great research impact on and how the research impact change over time.
The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics
This study examined 400 biographical Wikipedia articles on academics from four scientific fields to test if being featured in the world’s largest online encyclopedia is correlated with higher academic notability (assessed through citation counts).
Identification of milestone papers through time-balanced network centrality
Universality of Citation Distributions for Academic Institutions and Journals
This work studies the distributions of citations to publications from individual academic institutions for a single year to find this feature seems to be universal for a broad selection of institutions irrespective of the average number of citations per article.
Scholarometer: a system for crowdsourcing scholarly impact metrics
A new universal impact metric hs is integrated that uses crowdsourced data to calculate the global rank of a scholar across disciplinary boundaries and has increased the accuracy from 80% to 87%.
Understanding the Scientific Enterprise: Citation Analysis, Data and Modeling
The present chapter aims at providing a brief overview of the progress recently made in the analysis of bibliographic databases by focusing on studies devoted to the statistical description of distributions of citations received by individual publications.


Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact
It is shown that the probability that an article is cited c times has large variations between different disciplines, but all distributions are rescaled on a universal curve when the relative indicator cf = c/c0 is considered, where c0 is the average number of citations per article for the discipline.
A Reverse Engineering Approach to the Suppression of Citation Biases Reveals Universal Properties of Citation Distributions
An exhaustive study of the citation patterns of millions of papers is performed, and it is found that a simple transformation of citation counts able to suppress the disproportionate citation counts among scientific domains is derived.
A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures
The results indicate that the notion of scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator, although some measures are more suitable than others.
Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals
  • H. Moed
  • Computer Science
    J. Informetrics
  • 2010
Integrated Impact Indicators (I3) compared with Impact Factors (IFs): An alternative research design with policy implications
I3 is compared with IFs for the journals in two Institute for Scientific Information subject categories (“Information Science & Library Science” and “Multidisciplinary Sciences”), and the library and information science set is additionally decomposed in terms of nations.
Scholarometer: A Social Framework for Analyzing Impact across Disciplines
This work describes a system called Scholarometer, which provides a service to scholars by computing citation-based impact measures by creating an incentive for users to provide disciplinary annotations of authors, which in turn can be used to compute disciplinary metrics.
Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?
This work has obtained the rank plots of h and h I for four Brazilian scientific communities and found the h I index rank plots collapse into a single curve allowing comparison among different research areas.
Lifting the crown - citation z-score
The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.
The journal impact factor was created to help select additional source journals and is based on the number of citations in the current year to items published in the previous 2 years, which allows for the inclusion of many small but influential journals.