Universality of citation distributions revisited

  title={Universality of citation distributions revisited},
  author={Ludo Waltman and Nees Jan van Eck and Anthony F. J. van Raan},
  journal={J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.},
Radicchi, Fortunato, and Castellano (2008) claim that, apart from a scaling factor, all fields of science are characterized by the same citation distribution. We present a large-scale validation study of this universality-of-citation-distributions claim. Our analysis shows that claiming citation distributions to be universal for all fields of science is not warranted. Although many fields indeed seem to have fairly similar citation distributions, there are exceptions as well. We also briefly… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Universality of citation distributions: A new understanding

It is shown that the near-universal shape of the citation distributions for different disciplines and for different citation years traces its origin to the nearly universal fitness distribution, while deviations from this shape are associated with the discipline-specific citation dynamics of papers.

The evaluation of citation distributions

This paper reviews a number of recent contributions that demonstrate that a blend of welfare economics and statistical analysis is useful in the evaluation of the citations received by scientific

University citation distributions

The main findings are that the universality claim, according to which all university‐citation distributions, appropriately normalized, follow a single functional form, is not supported by the data, and the 500 university citation distributions are all highly skewed and very similar.

Universality of performance indicators based on citation and reference counts

This work demonstrates that comparisons can be made between publications from different disciplines and publication dates, regardless of their citation count and without expensive access to the whole world-wide citation graph.

Distribution of Citations in one Volume of a Journal

The set of citations collected during fixed period is interpreted as a characteristic statistical distribution of citations, argued about its properties and conjecture what statistical measures represent reliably such distributions, all derived solely from the distribution function.

Differences in citation impact across scientific fields

A novel method for measuring which part of overall citation inequality can be attributed to differences in citation practices across scientific fields is introduced, and an empirical strategy for making meaningful comparisons between the number of citations received by articles in the 22 broad fields distinguished by Thomson Scientific is implemented.

Universality of Citation Distributions for Academic Institutions and Journals

This work studies the distributions of citations to publications from individual academic institutions for a single year to find this feature seems to be universal for a broad selection of institutions irrespective of the average number of citations per article.

Modelling citation networks

The shape of such distributions is characterised by a ‘width’, $$\sigma ^2$$σ2, associated with fitting a log-normal to each distribution, and the width is found to be approximately constant for publications published in different years.



Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact

It is shown that the probability that an article is cited c times has large variations between different disciplines, but all distributions are rescaled on a universal curve when the relative indicator cf = c/c0 is considered, where c0 is the average number of citations per article for the discipline.

Rescaling citations of publications in Physics

It is shown that rescaling citation numbers by the number of publication authors has strong effects and should therefore be taken into account when assessing the bibliometric performance of researchers.

Universality of citation distributions–A validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator c f = c-c 0 at the micro level using data from chemistry

Results indicate that z-scores are better suited than cf values to produce universality of discipline-specific citation distributions.

The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates

The results of the aggregation into disciplines and fields reveal that power law algebra is a subtle phenomenon and the shape of these distributions over three broad categories of articles appears strikingly similar.

On the fairness of using relative indicators for comparing citation performance in different disciplines

The average number of citations is shown to be strongly correlated with the impact factor, but fluctuations are quite large, and a similar universal distribution is found when citation distributions restricted to papers published in a single journal are considered.

Effectiveness of Journal Ranking Schemes as a Tool for Locating Information

This work systematically evaluates the effectiveness of journals, through the work of editors and reviewers, at evaluating unpublished research, and develops a model for the asymptotic number of citations accrued by papers published in a journal that closely matches the data.

Lifting the crown - citation z-score

Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations