United States Military Intervention and the Promotion of Democracy

@article{Meernik1996UnitedSM,
  title={United States Military Intervention and the Promotion of Democracy},
  author={James Meernik},
  journal={Journal of Peace Research},
  year={1996},
  volume={33},
  pages={391 - 402}
}
  • James Meernik
  • Published 1 November 1996
  • Political Science, Sociology
  • Journal of Peace Research
All through history, when United States presidents have sought to explain or defend US military interventions in foreign lands, no goal, with the exception of the national security of the United States, has been advanced with such regularity and frequency as the promotion of democracy. Interestingly, however, this readiness to use force in the name of democracy does not appear to square with some of the emerging findings on the pacific relations among democratic nations. If states do not war on… 

Tables from this paper

Intervention and Democracy

Recent events have raised questions about the extent to which military intervention promotes democracy and the degree to which this depends on the nature of the intervener. We argue that traction on

Military Intervention and Prospects for Democratization

Abstract Even before the Iraq war of 2003, a body of literature was developing concerning the possibility of implanting democracy in developing states. Recent works by Mark Peceny (1999a and 1999b)

Forcing Them To Be Free

Is it possible to force other states to be free by imposing democracy on them during military interventions? This article analyzes the histori cal relationship between U.S. military intervention and

Nation Building and Women: The Effect of Intervention on Women’s Agency

Regardless of the primary motive, international military intervention aimed at nation building is partly intended to establish democratic societies. And scholars have demonstrated that intervention

Democratic Jihad ? Military Intervention and Democracy 1

Democracies rarely if ever fight one another, but they participate in wars as frequently as autocracies. They tend to win the wars that they participate in. Democracies frequently build large

Democratic Jihad? Military Intervention and Democracy

Democracies rarely if ever fight one another, but they participate in wars as frequently as autocracies. They tend to win the wars in which they participate. Democracies frequently build large

Why Does the U.S. Intervene Abroad? Democracy, Human Rights Violations, and Terrorism

Democracy, human rights, and terrorism are major foreign policy issues. However, among these issues, what do U.S. leaders care about most? This study assesses the degree to which Washington responds

Democracy by Force: The Impact of US Military Intervention on Democracy in Post- Cold War Haiti

This paper contributes to the current debate on the democratic impact of US military intervention in the post-Cold War era through a comparative study of two interventions in Haiti in 1994 and 2004.

Assisting democrats or resisting dictators? The nature and impact of democracy support by the United States National Endowment for Democracy, 1990–99

With the advance of the ‘third wave’ of democratization, developed countries such as the United States have implemented explicit strategies of democracy promotion by providing assistance to

Imposing democracy by force: can it be done?

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)%%%%IMPOSING DEMOCRACY BY FORCE: CAN IT BE DONE? The imposition and promotion of democracy through military force is an idea that has been
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 34 REFERENCES

Can the United States Promote Democracy

Is it possible for the United States to promote democracy and pluralism? Are there potential actions, programs, and policies to be undertaken or avoided -that will encourage the development of an

Democracy, War, and Covert Action

It is well established that stable industrialized democracies do not use overt force against each other. But do democracies ever use covert force against other elected governments? This article

Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace

Democratic peace theory has also come to have a real-world importance as well: Policymakers who have embraced democratic peace theory see a crucial link between America’s security and the spread of democracy, which is viewed as the antidote that will prevent future wars.

Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War

  • David A. Lake
  • Political Science
    American Political Science Review
  • 1992
Democracies are less likely to fight wars with each other. They are also more likely to prevail in wars with autocratic states. I offer an explanation of this syndrome of powerful pacifism drawn from

Democracy and Its Critics

Part 1 The sources of modern democracy: the first transformation - to the democratic city-state toward the second transformation - republicanism, representation, and the logic of equality. Part 2

Quest for a Post-Cold War Foreign Policy

WITH THE END of the Cold War, the disintegra tion of the Soviet Union and the shrinkage and transmutation of the Soviet threat, the United States has lost the magnetic north for calibrating its

Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis

  • S. PoeC. Tate
  • Political Science
    American Political Science Review
  • 1994
This crossnational study seeks to explain variations in governmental repression of human rights to personal integrity (state terrorism) in a 153-country sample during the eighties. We outline

Libertarianism and International Violence

Based on theory and previous results, three hypotheses are posed: (1) Libertarian states have no violence between themselves. (2) The more libertarian two states, the less their mutual violence. (3)

Tracking Democracy's Third Wave with the Polity III Data

This article reports and analyzes an updated version of the widely-used Polity II dataset, consisting of annual indicators of institutional democracy and autocracy for 161 states spanning the years

Democracy and War Involvement

Most quantitative researchers had agreed that regime type and war involvement are not significantly related to each other until Rummel recently challenged this consensus. According to Rummel,